What is the New World Order?

Before going on and reading the rest of the website it is important to define certain terms and agendas and ask a few basic questions to build a foundation for the New World Order concept, as it is often misconstrued by the mainstream as a view held only by fundamental Christians, armed right wingers or conspiracy theorists. The fact is it’s an everybody concept, whether you like it it or not. The New World Order agenda isn’t just for this group or that political movement, it’s for everyone. People from all walks of life are entertaining the information offered by NWO researchers. Society needs to move beyond the political left or right playing field. Because that’s what it is, a play, a game on the “grand chessboard” of life. People cling to their political party like they do a sports team, but unfortunately political beliefs are “beliefs” not facts. You are doing yourself an injustice by boxing yourself in to a mindset and then slapping on the label of democrat, republican, liberal or conservative. At the very top of the political spectrum the same agenda for global governance is taking place.

To understand the New World Order agenda there are a few simple questions for you to answer:

- Who are the richest people in the world, and who controls the entire monetary system? Bankers.

- Who appears to make decisions on world policy, who we go to war with, and our laws and legislation? Government and in some historical cases Royalty.

- Who controls and manufactures our necessities, material possessions and media consumption? the Corporate world.

Then there can be no debate on who controls the world – whether left or right it’s the above groups. The real debate is a trust issue. Some people entrust their lives to the above groups and think they have our best interests at heart. Others believe these people are corrupt, self centered psychopaths.

If you trust these elite, this “artificial aristocracy”, these “different personages” then you might see globalization as just inevitable human progression. However if you see your freedoms slipping away day by day, and it’s becoming obvious to you that something is rotten in the world, you might call it a New World Order agenda.

It would then be foolish to call it a right wing conspiracy theory or christian end times movement. Everybody perceives it in a different way according to their belief system. But they DO perceive it. Whether you are a Liberal, Democrat or Republican the agenda includes YOU and your family.

So what is the New World Order?

The NWO is a concept documented throughout history that suggests society has been guided by a “hidden hand” in to gradually handing over it’s freedom to the aformetioned groups, with the endgame being a global banking, global government, global corporate monopoly system where these few unelected power elite have complete control over the rest of humanity in what you could call a communist/marxist/socialist system, depending on what you associate with these terms.

There are many names for the few at the top of the control system, but beyond their specific organizations and secret groupings they don’t have any one name, nor call themselves any particular moniker. Most of these groups aren’t particularly secret and have very open titles and superficial causes. There’s no denying that organizations such as the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR), Trilateral Commission, Club of Rome and Bilderberg Group exist – most have their own websites, trade journals and public member lists. It’s what they are doing behind closed-doors that threatens our future.

The Illuminati, Corporatocracy, Brotherhood, Elite, Internationalists, Brethren, Globalists, Cartels, Monopolists, Banksters, Powers That Be, Establishment, Hidden Hand, Plutocracy and The Man are just some of the labels given by observers, researchers and whistleblowers when referring to these rich unelected controllers. Not all of the elites are directly linked by blood or spiritual belief (although many are), but they all interact together and collectively push forward a one world Government agenda or “New World Order” through their countless corporations, organizations and hierarchies of control. Their network of banks, businesses, charities, societies and think tanks have slowly developed over hundreds of years and now have a devastating global reach that can bypass all of our democratic rights. They also control all of our education, communication, media outlets and entertainment; so it is therefore not very hard to keep the masses or “sheep” in ignorance. Many people within this establishment aren’t aware of what they are doing, but it’s happening regardless.

Has this plot ever been reported on the nightly news? Not initially (unless it was a fluff/conspiracy piece), because some rich globalist somewhere owns that news network. However in recent years the agenda has been openly admitted if almost to mock us. Now globalization appears to be an accepted fact, and even the term New World Order gets thrown around a few times a week by economists, politicians and news anchors. They may use it in the context of the economy, climate change or the EU, but the uses of the term all have the same theme. Consolidation of power in to fewer and fewer hands.

Why is it that some people just seem destined to succeed and become incredibly wealthy?

This is because the elite use what some call feeder systems or secret society hierarchies. It’s really just the ladder system the world operates by – there are those at the top and those at the bottom of the ladder.

There are many institutions or organizations that are barred, limited in access or skewed in purpose from the general public, which manipulate information, and/or groom “hand picked” people in to positions of power that will work the rotten agenda. Using this process they keep this power structure from crumbling down because average people never reach the top rung. Freedom and democracy is nothing more than an illusion.

There exists secret or semi-secret societies like the Freemasons or Yale University’s Skull & Bones, who’s bizarre initiation involves lying naked in a coffin, holding a skull, divulging your deepest sexual secrets to a crowd of spoon fed preppies. Other subversive groups include charities that make large donations to support the agenda, hide money from the tax man or openly push forward types of social engineering such as the Rockefeller Foundation or Planned Parenthood. They can be educational programs or training (indoctrination) courses like Common Purpose, which is infiltrating Britain; or other more innocent looking fraternities, gentleman’s clubs, or schools that allow grants to the gifted, or entry based on social standing. They include think tanks that offer ideas to governments, or Non-Governmental-Organizations (NGOs) that put pressure on governments to fulfill a certain agenda (the green movement). There are research groups and committees, and the more obvious world powers like the UN and the EU that take control away from the people and give it to Bureaucrats and their controllers.

This system is all around us and looks harmless enough from the superficial public facade, but it bypasses all of regular society’s rules and innate human rights to put puppets the controllers want in to power, while speeding along an agenda that aims to unite the world in to a neo-marxist dictatorship that this ruling elite will control. Nobody elected them to do any of this and they do not disclose their full plans to the masses.

So why do they need such a deceptive system?

Because they are corrupt, blinded by greed and do not care about the average citizen! They understand that if they were honest about their plans the public would reject them right away. Their plan has been carefully crafted and slowly revealed over hundreds if not thousands of years. Henry Kissinger an elite adviser explained this at one of their secret Bilderberg meetings in 1991 during the LA Riot. “Today, America would be outraged if UN troops entered Los Angeles to restore order. Tomorrow they will be grateful! This is especially true if they were told that there were an outside threat from beyond, whether real or promulgated! That threatened our very existence. It is then that all peoples of the world will plead to deliver them from this evil. The one thing every man fears is the unknown. When presented with this scenario, individual rights will be willingly relinquished for the guarantee of their well-being granted to them by the world government.”

Since that time and prior to that meeting the elite have manipulated us in to fearing outside threats such as terrorism or global warming in order to take away our freedom and gain more control under a world system. They have even staged events such as Pearl Harbor and the Gulf of Tonkin incident and blamed them on enemies as pretexts for war.

As Kissinger said we would be outraged if a global police force suddenly invaded our cities, but as the UN expands it could happen in the future, at which time the masses will have been conditioned to accept it. We already have a rising police and private security presence around the world.

In an honest and democratic world, everybody should have the right, freedom and opportunity to be successful and happy. Everybody from Joe the plumber to Michael the investment banker should be provided with all the information about the agendas that have a bearing on the society they live in. Decisions should not be exclusive to a group of elites dressed in druid hoods in the woods of California (oh it gets better). And if we disagree with these people, we should have the right to call them out without being blocked by laws, their heavies or media prejudice.

“The very word ’secrecy’ is repugnant in a free and open society; and we are as a people inherently and historically opposed to secret societies, to secret oaths, and to secret proceedings.”
JFK before his assassination.

The evil that goes on at the top of this power structure is so incomprehensibly inhumane, they need a way of keeping it secret or at least sugar-coated. Thus instead of openly admitting what they do, they must have a complicated web of hierarchies to groom people in to continuing the agenda. By time candidates are fully indoctrinated and reach a top level position in business, government or banking, they believe in the agenda’s purpose, only seeing reality through their controller’s elitist bubble, and thus the cycle continues for the next generation, while the masses are completely unaware that anything untoward is taking place. We may however be letting them off too lightly, many know full well what they are doing and don’t need to be “brainwashed” in order to carry out a New World Order; it is these people we must look to as traitors. Our sons are dying everyday in wars that only benefit the control system and wealth of the elite, after being fed a lie about fighting for freedom by their commanders and very often their parents! Since when did peace mean war? We ourselves need to accept a certain amount of personal responsibility for burying our heads in the sand. When we blindly parrot “support our troops” how about we actually support them, by bringing them home…in one piece and without lost limbs, chemical deformities or warped minds?

The United Nation’s World Order

For people who flatly deny that there is a New World Order agenda despite them admitting it themselves every week, or for those that see globalization and the unification of world powers as a positive mission, then one of the simplest ways of explaining it is with the United Nations. You don’t have to be a historian, expert or even somebody that takes much interest in the news to realize that the United Nations is an extremely powerful global body that now outranks many sovereign nations when it comes to world issues. The whole Swine Flu hype had directives from the UN and the World Health Organization. This groups have had their hand in most modern wars and conflicts – many of which they declared. Just look at the meaning of it’s very name “United Nations”. Doesn’t that suggest some kind of uniting of nations in to a world order?

Publications have discussed the UN since its inception in 1945, with most of them promoting it. You’ll get completely one sided pieces in the elite owned journals, magazines and newsletters, calling for more control by the UN and strongly touting its virtues as a way to protect the world. As you sieve through in to the more mainstream publications you get the “impartial analysts” that simply accept the UN as “inevitable”, as if we have no say and there is no dispute on the matter.

Unfortunately with the media favoring the UN or simply accepting it as inevitable, the general populous do not even bat an eyelid; it enters collective subconscious and it becomes as normal as butter on bread. In fact the average citizen probably couldn’t tell you what the UN is, its history or why it is there, but they’ll happily go along with its orders when presented with it on Fox News. As you’ll see throughout this website there is a definite deception that needs to be explained to the public, so they can at least make an educated opinion on what the purpose of the UN and globalism really is. Ignorance is not bliss in the long run. You might not be the first target on the list, but it doesn’t mean you are not on the list. Warrantless wiretapping and detainment without due-process is now fully legal in the West.

There are many think tanks and organizations that support the UN and push forward a globalist agenda as we will see. All of which have influence on world policy, but are not democratic. The World Federalist Association (now merged with other groups) has historically been a strong backer of this movement. The late CBS anchorman Walter Cronkite, who had an immense following and an important position that shaped people’s perceptions, was a World Federalist and he was given the WFA’s award for pushing this one sided world order opinion on to the masses through his TV programming. During the acceptance speech he was treated to a personal video message from Hillary Clinton, congratulating him for supporting the same agenda that she herself has always supported.

It seems media bias for the UN has always been rampant. For writing “The Birth of a Global Nation” in July 1992, Strobe Talbott was honored to accept a position as deputy secretary of state in Bill Clinton’s administration. The New York Times is another offender, giving the WFA print space on a number of occasions. There’s no doubt that its editorial slant, along with most other publications is in favor of world governance. In fact by the sheer nature of the system, most mainstream publications are owned by globalists, the government or in some cases heavily backed by the military.

As Mr. Elite, David Rockefeller himself (he’ll crop up many times), who donated the ground in which the UN’s base stands today, told the Trilateral Commission think tank in 1991, “We are grateful to the Washington Post, the New York Times, Time magazine and other great publications whose directors have attended our meetings and respected the promises of discretion for almost forty years.” This discretion of course is in regard to the New World Order plan.

Giving a white-washed one sided view of globalization and the UN is one thing he thanks the media for, but he also thanks them for keeping quiet on the corrupt intricacies of the wider agenda, which is far more ghastly than can be openly admitted.

The late Californian senator Alan Cranston in agreement with the earlier quote from Kissinger wrote the following in a 1976 edition of Transition Magazine, explaining why a new world order needs to be carefully revealed to the masses rather than being rampantly discussed. “The more talk about world government, the less chance of achieving it…because it frightens people who would accept the concept of world law,” which is something now being pushed in the climate change community’s plans for world taxation.

However, this whitewash/secrecy tactic doesn’t stop documents leaking from time to time that reveal the wider agenda. “A World Effectively Controlled by the United Nations”, which is self explanatory, was commissioned by the US State Department in the 60s, and is just one example of such documents. So when you hear Gordon Brown, Obama or Van Rumpoy talking about a New World Order, it is then important to realize that these plans have been down in writing years before now. It is really an Old Word Order that most certainly wasn’t voted for by the people and has slowly revealed itself without conscious awareness of it happening. We might sit there and think, “hmmm global governance might be a good way to prevent wars in the middle east”. But was that really our own thought? Who explained to us the concept of global governance in the first place? And better still, who caused the wars to begin with?

Henry Kissinger

As outlined in their official documents, supporting publications and as quoted by Kissinger, one of the major goals of the UN is to have a monopoly over military activity, where there would only be one world army controlled by them. All former sovereign nations would have to disarm for this world power. So if there is only one army, who are their targets? Quite simply anybody that speaks out against the regime. You and me if we choose to stand up for our sovereign rights! They don’t mention that when calling it a “global community” or other fluffy terms on the nightly news.

NATO, who has interfered with the unjust wars in Iraq and Afghanistan is a precursor to a full blown UN Army. The European Union itself is its own mini United Nations, which they would ideally like to merge with other mini Unions to bring about world control.

Peace might seem to be their intention. They certainly talk a lot about peace in their speeches. If the world is united then there will be world peace right? But if corrupt bankers and corporate monopolists with dubious pasts and inhumane views on the general public (as we’ll see) are the ones controlling this new order, we might want to seek an alternative to their vision. Sovereign nations, republics and democratic societies are ran by the people for the people, with the government only there to protect our inherent rights. Despite this fact, whether it be parties with the exact same agenda or the emergence of unelected rulers, like Herman Van Rupoy in Europe, we’ve seen our votes count less and less as we move towards globalization. We do still have a tiny amount of control over our elected officials, but a full blown one world power answers to no one. Nobody is disagreeing that we need an integrated world to conduct trade and prevent conflicts, but there’s a big difference between free trade agreements and military treaties, and a New World Order dictatorship. What might seem like peace on the surface is actually subservience to tyranny.

As we’ve seen time and time again in the backward world we live in, this peace they speak of is often only brought about by war. “We must go to war to bring this nation peace.” (or in pieces). This is simply two contradictory views being held at once, just like the doublethink concept described in George Orwell’s 1984, a not so fictional work of fiction. How can anyone believe that we must force the world to unite in order to bring peace?

In the early 60s the UN’s doublethink leaders decided it was going to bring peace and freedom to the Belgian colony of the African Congo…by inciting a war. They declared its independence alright, but instead of truly bringing them freedom, they ushered in communist puppet Patrice Lumumba to take the helm, resulting in a civil massacre; not even children were exempt from slaughter, and of course lots of money was made from this blood by corporate arms manufacturers and the bankers that financed the conflict. Remember, somebody has to build and sell weapons for war and somebody has to fund war, and somebody must declare war. There have been over 40 wars, or “peace keeping efforts” since the inception of the UN and they have all been funded and declared by government, funded by bankers and supplied with weapons by the corporate world.

During the Congo incident there was however some hope. A small province of the Congo, called Katanga had yet to be brutalized, and under straight laced leader Moïse Kapenda Tshombe, who knew the value of free market capitalism, the region looked set for positive growth. Tshombe knew the dangers of corrupted ideologies like communism, and although he had a business mind and somewhat of a Western philosophy, he couldn’t be bribed and was determined to run his state without elitist agenda; the true free market democratic way, not the corporate monopoly way. For once it looked like an African nation was going to rise up under its own governance and productivity…How wrong we were.

Unfortunately this idea of freedom in the Congo wasn’t quite what the shadow rulers of the UN wanted. It was more of a pretty facade. No, what the elites really wanted was an independent Congo…controlled by a Puppet – Patrice Lumumba. It was just an illusion of independence. What seemed like a Soviet plot in defiance of other countries, was actually discussed openly in the UN. Soviet Communist leader Nikita Krushchev called Tshombe a traitor to go against Lumumba and the UN’s decrees – other UN Ambassadors listened and decided that Krushchev was correct. US Elite bankers and globalists, along with deluded liberals that couldn’t see the root cause of the communist plot, happily made agreements with the other nations in the UN and it was collectively decided that a joint USSR-US military presence was needed to “bring freedom” to the Congo.

In December 1961 US troops who were told that Tshombe (not puppet communist Lamumba) was the terrorist, invaded Katanga and reduced the poor state to ruins. The post office and radio station were deliberately bombed so the only version of events spun to the rest of the world came from official UN sources. The only voice of the innocent citizens came from Western doctors, who pleaded with the UN to stop the butchery. But their cries fell on deaf ears. In fact hospitals clearly marked as neutral ground were also bombed without a second thought. Yet despite this genocide, this war against humanity, the UN deemed the operation a success and the ambitious nation fell under communist rule. Globalist owned news networks or independents that had no access to real information did nothing to inform the masses of this crime and the UN’s “peace project” in Africa continued the way it started. Propagandized, with its true agenda kept secret. When it came time to rebuild the destruction caused by the UN, it wouldn’t be local citizens and businesses that got the contracts to erect the infrastructure, it was a handful of western elite ran corporations; meaning absolutely nothing went to the local economy and the poor stayed poor under tyrannical communist rule.

Is this really peace?

We are lead to believe that one of the goals of the UN and Globalization is to bring peace to the world and freedom to Africa, allowing them to develop. If we look at the elite’s actions and the Congo crisis as an example, we see that what they are actually doing is keeping the continent in poverty through puppet leaders, communist rule and deceptive economic policy. We are always giving aid to Africa. We see UN choppers throwing bags of grain to outstretched malnourished hands. Every once in a while we get footage of a new water well being installed or a hospital made out of a shack. In the UK ounce a year we are told to donate during a primetime TV special, that features hammed up comedy performances, interspersed with deeply upsetting clips of starving children. The truth is we can give all we want, and we can be made to feel guilty for not donating, but unless the globalists actually stop giving them loans they can’t pay back, stop forcing puppet leaders on them, stop rationing development through communism, stop forcing them to go “green” before they’ve even got adequate health-care and stop stealing all of their natural resources, they will never ever be free. All they did in the 60s and later was remove old fashioned colonization with European countries and insert soviet communism or corrupt dictators. It really isn’t any different. Freedom to these people is just a word.

The majority of African leaders are westernized puppets. Only the richest own monopolies over the resources and do not pass on this wealth to the millions and millions of very poor – it’s black on black slavery. As well as these African run monopolies many elite western corporations also hold a firm grip over business, trade and manufacture. Locals are paid a pittance while goods are shipped off and sold at extremely inflated prices in the US, UK and so on. That alone keeps them from ever developing. But if that wasn’t enough, institutions like the World Bank and the IMF often loan the continent money to build infrastructure and development, that they A) cannot realistically pay back, or B) is not really used to support the economy in the long run.

Under the economic hitman system, world bank and IMF loans are given to these desperate countries to “help” them develop, but development projections tend to get fudged and it’s often impossible to pay back the loans. On top of this it is usually elite run western companies that are paid by Africa to then build the infrastructure. So really the money never leaves the west. It goes from a western bank, to Africa, back to a western company and then back in to the western banking cartel. Because Africa has corrupt leaders, it is not the poor that benefit from the developments built by the loans, and in worst case scenarios it is actually western companies with a presence already in Africa that own the new developments. Despite being the second largest continent in the world, with a nearly 700 million population, Africa isn’t really owned or controlled be Africans.

A case in point: The 2010 Soccer World Cup will be held in South Africa and Stadiums are being built to accommodate the mega-event. Although the media are touting that it will bring a lot of money in to the African economy, the truth is it probably won’t. First off it is not South African workers that have been given the construction jobs. The contract was given to UK firm Bam Construct. Secondly whatever money does come in to the South African economy through tourism will most definitely bypass the poor and go straight in to the hands of the rich elite that own the stores and hotels, many of which are actually western companies. To make room for the stadiums, poor South Africans are actually being evicted from their shanti-homes and those that refuse have been beaten and murdered by unknown heavies.

No matter how it’s spun this is not peace! When we give military assistance we are giving death and tyrannical rule, when we give aid we are upholding socialism, and when we give loans we are giving debt. The answer to this problem is not clear, but the UN or global order is most certainly not the answer. And one very important thing must be considered. If you are a rich western globalist, which is in your best interest? Keeping a huge population like Africa in poverty so you can utilize slave labor and prevent future competition. As John D. Rockefeller said, “competition is a sin”. Or supporting their independent development so one day they can be on par with you? – Why is Africa in poverty? There is your answer.

In 1975 following the Vietnam War the UN communist plot hit Cambodia when the Khmer Rouge led by Pol Pot took over the country and executed nearly 2 million people. The incident has become known as the “killing fields” due to the apocalyptic sight of human bones that were left in piles around the region. The UN did absolutely nothing and many of its openly communist members supported the massacre. The elite’s support of Hitler was kept under wraps (and well be explained later), but the killings in Cambodia where openly applauded. In an address to the UN, Ieng Sary, the Rouge’s foreign minister is quoted as saying “we cleansed the cities”, and delegates hollered and cheered in their seats at the genocide.

Another tyrannical regime supported by the elites at the United Nations is the “people’s” Republic of China – or more true to action, the communist dictatorship of Mao Tse Tung, who butchered a record 60 million of his own people, but is somewhat unknown compared to Hitler, who’s holocaust is often exploited. The elites have supported China since Mao booted out the Nationalists following World War II, but even they knew allowing the regime in to the UN would cause an uproar. So instead they waited until the tyranny had become common place, accepting them in 1971 to lesser opposition…well actually a big applause. In one of the newspapers that David Rockefeller was so thankful towards for keeping quiet, the NWO spokesman blurted out the following revealing quote. “The social experiment in China under Chairman Mao’s leadership is one of the most important and successful in human history” – David Rockefeller, NY Times, 1973. Maybe Mao’s inclusion in to the UN was actually his reward for undertaking the experiment for Rockefeller?

What experiment might that be then? The Red China Regime is the most feared in modern times, they have a strict one child policy and subsequent forced abortion, they euthanize the elderly, a brutal police state stomps out dissidents, there are Nazi style forced labor camps, organs are harvested from criminals and sold to the west in mobile death vans, and the internet is completely censored; the whole system is dehuminist, robotic and authoritarian with the state owning most major industries. It is a template for the rest of the world and is supported religiously by the elites.

The UN is supposed to be about peace and human rights;about creating a united world where war is eliminated. So why do they allow genocidal regimes and atrocities such as the above? Look at Tianemen Square, where peaceful students were slaughtered by tanks, all because they were protesting for peace? Why is it that the UK and several US administrations have taken tax payer’s dollars and donated them to Chinese population control measures and abortions? It’s another example of doublethink. Say one thing (peace) do another (death) and fail to report the problems to the masses, who would sooner watch the soccer World Cup.

Ted Turner, the founder of news network CNN gave $22 million to the United Nations specifically for Chinese population reduction programs, and is quoted as wanting a 95% genocide of the world’s population; something echoed by many elites and scientists including Dr Erik Pianka, a biologist who received a standing ovation after giving a speech at the Texas Academy of Science, where he called for the death of 90% of the global populous, naming the airborne ebola virus an efficient way of doing so. This way of thinking has now filtered in to mainstream news where they link the alleged need for population reduction to climate change, as if killing everyone will save the environment. What about the people?

Mass genocide is not just a concept pushed by extreme dictators or a few elite oddballs. In Memorandum 200, written by Henry Kissinger, then Secretary of State and National Security advisory, he lays out official US foreign policy regarding population control. Kissinger (a nobel “peace” prize winner) explained that the threat of competition from developing nations such as Africa posed a serious problem for America’s strategic, economic, and military interests, so by the year 2000 he advised that “a two-child family on average” should be reached throughout the world. The plan was to utilize the UN, the IMF and World Bank to fund the measures through their aid and loan programs. Countries obtaining aid would also have to agree to implement population reduction policy as a prerequisite.

This however didn’t always go smoothly, so the globalists had to adopt a more sugar-coated approach. In a 1992 operations evaluation, the World Bank wrote, “Political sensitivities about population-control policies of foreigners made it difficult for Bank staff to breach the topic with governments … The Bank’s current approach in Latin America is to focus on reproductive health and safe motherhood as the rationale for family planning.” The report continued, “If the Bank wants to work in countries that do not accept population control as the rationale, it must base its population program on a broader and more flexible set of principles. This could start from a recognition that the overall objective is promotion of sustainable development in living standards …”

It seems as long as it supports the wider agenda of the elite that control the west, namely money, consolidated power and the extermination of human life through eugenics policies and war, the UN couldn’t care what communist dictator or in fact renowned nobel prize winner stands waffling on the UN podium, or how many innocent people are massacred. The idea that they are working towards peace is just a facade shown to the general public, the same public that are at the other end of the UN’s tirade. It’s almost laughable if wasn’t so tragic.

Dr. Caroll Quigley an elite sympathizing professor and mentor to Bill Clinton wrote the book “Tragedy and Hope” in 1966. He socialized in such circles so obtained free reign over their documents. He wrote, “There does exist, and has existed for a generation, an international Anglophile network which operates, to some extent, in the way the radical Right believes the Communists act. In fact, this network, which we may identify as the Round Table Groups, has no aversion to cooperating with the Communists, or any group, and frequently does so.”

You only have to look at the formation of the UN to understand that it is one of the many organizations that was created to push through a New World Order in favor of the elites, not in favor of the democratic people. Starting out as the League of Nations, an addition to the post World War I “Peace Treaty”, it was their first open push for interconnectedness. Puppet President Woodrow Wilson was the US’ main advocate of the League, a man who fully supported the banker’s takeover of the Federal Reserve (which we’ll get to).

The US public initially didn’t bite. This took the shadow government underground where they formed the Council on Foreign Relations under David Rockefeller, who’s purpose was to push forward the agenda by covert means.

Because the US public didn’t support the League of Nations they began drafting the United Nations (just a change in semantics) and through their publication “Foreign Affairs” and their wider reaching media outlets, puppet politicians who were members, and banking and business associates took on the ideology. The New World Order idea was slowly pushed on to the masses as a solution to war and other global issues. Since its inception a whos who list of powerful people have been CFR members. A more modern list includes Dick Cheney, John Kerry, Bill Clinton, Al Gore, Rudy Giuliani, Condolezza Rice, Alan Greenspan of the Federal Reserve, and even Angelina Jolie! Obama wrote articles for their Foreign Affairs magazine before becoming President and his own administration is full of Bankers and CFR members.

Richard Howard, a maverick journalist for the Washington Post wrote an expose in 1993 stating, “The President [Clinton] is a member. So is his Secretary of state, the deputy Secretary, all five of the undersecretaries and several of the assistants.”

Let there be no confusion about their agenda – Dr. Carrol Quiqley, in Tragedy & Hope continued, “I know of the operations of this network, because I studied it for twenty years, and was permitted for two years to examine its papers and secret records…[their ultimate goal is] to create a world system of financial control [World Bank/IMF] in private hands, able to dominate the political system of each country and the economy of the world as a whole”.

All White House Administrations have been packed full of CFR members and bankers since its inception, yet the CFR is never held accountable for their agenda, and the public of course never get to vote on any of the CFR’s policies, or in fact who joins the group in the first place.

What keeps the UN, other groups and the New World Order afloat is this biased favorable media coverage by editors that happen to be CFR members. Those high up in the pyramid that are actively pushing through the agenda in politics, uninformed NGO’s that indirectly support the agenda (such as charities who think they are helping the 3rd world), and an uneducated public that don’t seek independent information outside of media that is controlled by globalists and CFR members again, also keep the house of cards stacked against the masses.

If we take just these small examples of how the UN and globalization is failing, does it still seem like a good idea to give more control to a world order? On paper a world utopia looks nice but in action it hasn’t worked so far has it? The idea that it is positive is only pushed by those that want it for their own gain, and by those that have read the supporting propaganda. The real aims of the NWO agenda are quite simple.

- One elite controlled Government with ultimate power over the world.
- One monetary system, ideally cashless and computerized to aid their banking scams.
- A government/elite monopoly over all industries, from food to health-care.
- An uneducated public distracted through materialism and propaganda.
- One army and police force that removes anyone opposed to the system.
- A big brother state where they can track every facet of our lives.

If we remove the “one” before each point and replace it as “interconnected” or “interdependent” then that’s basically what we already do have. They are in their last phase. However to understand this last phase and some of the information being presented it is important to trace the agenda from as far back as we can, and first describe their system of control.

The following articles originally planned for a book written by WideShut.co.uk editor Keelan Balderson, will take you on the full journey, from beginning to end of this New World Order agenda.