Share If Israel Sways UN, Iran Attack Will Be Globally Accepted
Jan 25th, 2012 | By Keelan Balderson | Category: Featured Articles, War and Terrorism |
Print
Prosor calls for UN action against Iran.
For those that followed the unjust attack of aggression against the Libyan people, a phrase that cropped up often was “in-line with the UN resolution”. If the UN says its ok, everybody else follows like it’s some kind of omnipresent power that must be obeyed.
In truth the UN is a globalist tool that allows the tyrannical leaders of the powerful western nations and Israel to exert their dominance over everybody else, while hiding behind the illusion of a global democratic system. Because of this illusion all actions undertaken are deemed moral and legal, and with full support of the “global community”, despite the majority of countries following whatever the Anglo-American-Israeli establishment have dictated in fear of being ostracized.
Enter Ron Prosor, Israel Ambassador to the UN. He told the Security Council in New York on Tuesday, that Iran is the single greatest threat to the world, and the United Nations needs to take action against them immediately [1].
Translation: I want the UN to pass some kind of resolution so when Israel, the US, Britain and the tag-alongs attack Iran, the thousands of deaths can be brushed off as “in-line with the UN resolution”, and therefore perfectly acceptable.
Of course in reality an attack on Iran is not acceptable and would be nothing more than an extension of all the other illegal and immoral wars, based on lies, that have engulfed the Middle-East since the contrived 9/11 attacks. It is the next step of Full Spectrum Dominance as outlined by the NEOCON/Israeli PNAC think tank [2]. In other words the next step of the global empire.
Prosor brashly claimed yesterday:
“Never has it been so clear Iran is seeking to build a nuclear weapon.” Of course he provided absolutely no evidence to support his assertion; there was no clarity at all. Just as there was no solid evidence of Gaddafi’s crimes, no WMDs in Iraq, and no evidence Bin Laden was behind 9/11 or that Afghanistan played a major role. Just because these people say it, and the media repeats it, doesn’t mean it’s true. Nothing they say ever holds up to logic or scrutiny.
Take for example Prosor’s next assertion, that “Tehran’s efforts to enrich uranium to 20 percent-levels at its reactor in Qom could serve no plausible aim other than to develop an atomic bomb.”
It sounds like a reasonable statement to those flicking through the mainstream news channels, but current nuclear technology means the only possible way to make an atomic bomb is to enrich uranium at above 85 percent [3]. Therefore Iran simply does not have the capability to develop a nuclear weapon and if they were perusing that path they are years and years away from being anywhere close. Furthermore even if they were enriching uranium above 20%, which there is no evidence for, they would also need transportation, the actual warheads, delivery systems, which you guessed it, there is no evidence for.
Unless Prosor is a moron, he knows full well what it takes to make nuclear weapons, because Israel has at least 150 of them [4]! Therefore we can only determine that he is a war-mongering religious fundamentalist nut job that wants your sons to fight his holy war against Islam!
He claims there’s no plausible aim for this 20% uranium. No plausible aim?
…hang on a minute…something is coming to me.
OH YES!
Nuclear power.
That’s right Iran has publicly stated that it’s pursing Nuclear Power. So could it be that their aim is nuclear power?
This is what President Ahmadinejad told CBS NEWS in 2010 about his views on Nuclear Weapons:
“The nuclear bomb is a fire against humanity rather than weapon for defense…Its possession is disgusting and shameful…even more shameful is the threat to use such weapons.”
Remember this is coming from the leader of a country that DOES NOT have a nuclear weapon. All the beating of the war drums come from Nuclear states like Israel, America, the only country to have used a nuclear weapon and Britain a nation that has 160 or so. Who is the aggressor? Who is the threat? In fact could you blame Iran if they did want a nuclear weapon to protect themselves? If Gaddafi had the bomb you can bet you devalued bottom dollar that he would not have been malled, sodomized and shot to death by NATO backed Al Qaeda forces.
Just like Libya, Israel and the West have already began supporting opposition terrorist groups like Jundullah to destabilize the country [5]. Sanctions are also firmly in place. The only thing left is true UN backing.
Nations that do not want more dead sons need to stand up for themselves and use the UN for what it was supposed to be, a mechanism for global peace, not a front for war. If Israel manages to push through a piece of paper that says it’s legal to attack Iran, then the attack will be globally accepted. Do you really want innocent people to die because a piece of paper told you it was ok?
*You can stay up to date with WideShut using our RSS Feed, Twitter, Facebook & Youtube
It is only necessary to have a surf around the Israeli on line newspapers and media (Haaretz The Jerusalem Post Ynetnews Arutz Sheva etc) to recognise a worrying aspect of media coverage of the Iran and Palestinian situations. Not so much in the actual reporting of events and editorial comments, although even these are themselves indicative of the preparation of their readership for future events, but more markedly in the comments and opinion sections to the articles. With a few exceptions, the submissions from the public are over the last 12 months or so, are becoming more and more extreme and vitriolic in content. In many ways, it is reminiscent of the press in Germany in 1938/1939 preparing the population for an inevitable war, to right the wrongs and injustices inflicted upon the German peoples during previous decades. Notwithstanding the injustices and wrongs of the Treaty of Versailles, the whole proposition was of course preposterous but the effects on public opinion were dramatic, leading to the acceptance by probably 95% of the population, of the idea that the only way to achieve justice was through a war of aggression.
The great and sinister difference in 2012 is that the arguments of the threat from Iran with its “Nuclear Ambitions” and from Palestine with its quest for a Palestinian State, are not restricted to circulation within one specific country. On the contrary, the rush to impose sanction, the threat of military action, and in the case of Palestine the actual strikes against the civilian population, have been endorsed and taken up by some other nations of the world. The United States, an unconditional supporter of Israel since 1947, and now The European Union, led by a coalition of The United Kingdom, France and Germany are leading the clamour for more and more draconian sanctions against Iran and the deployment of military forces in the Gulf area and Strait of Hormuz.
There is little doubt that in the propaganda war, the west, Israel, The United States and The EU have the advantage, since there has been a constant flow of disinformation and distortion for may years which is now becoming a torrent of belligerent output for public consumption. The Governments in the west appear to assume that the general population have short memories and soon forget the lies and hypocrisy associated with military conflicts and interventions since 1945, justified by the “spreading peace and democracy” argument. In George Orwell’s prophetic novel 1984 the concept of a perpetual enemy and constant warfare was muted as a means of control of the people. The similarities between the novel and reality now is remarkable.
Soon, I believe, peoples of the west will be faced with the stark choice of either blindly following the path set by their Governments, or resisting the cul-de-sac of notion that all countries of the world are destined to be subservient to our values and systems. I have made my choice.