Hollie Greig Story A Hoax?


iTunes | Stitcher | RSS Feed


Listen to every single episode, dating back to October 2010, with the Youtube Playlist

In the summer of 2000, Hollie told her mother, Anne, that she had been repeatedly sexually abused by her father, Denis Charles Mackie and brother Greg. The abuse had begun when Hollie was just six years` old. Hollie said that Greg had also been abused by his father.

Anne Greig reported this immediately to the local police station in Aberdeen. During the course of that summer, Hollie, who has Down`s Syndrome, began to provide more names of abusers. It transpired that Denis Mackie had been sharing his daughter with a ring of sexual abusers, which included a serving police officer with the Grampian force, Terry Major and an Aberdeen sheriff, Graeme Buchanan.


Is the Hollie Greig case a hoax? That’s the opinion of disaffected former supporters of the story, who went searching for basic evidence to support the claims of self-professed investigator Robert Green and Anne Greig, the mother of the lady in question, and found it completely lacking. According to them and their alternative media talking heads at the UK Column, Hollie Greig, a Down syndrome sufferer was abused by a gang of paedophile’s from the age of 6 years old.

On this week’s show Keelan talks with members of the Hollie Greig Hoax group, including two of Hollie’s alleged abusers, Sylvia Major and Wyn Dragon-Smith, who assert that the whole story is a fabrication. There is not one piece of physical, forensic, eye witness or circumstantial evidence that links either of these two ladies to any abuse of Hollie Greig, yet their names have been plastered all over the Internet and dragged through the mud.

In fact did you know that some of the members of this paedophile ring that has supposedly operated for over a decade in Aberdeen, Scotland, don’t even exist? Or that alleged victims alongside Hollie were either not yet born or adults before they even met her, and have publicly denied they were harmed in any way?

hollie greig

Did you know that Robert Green met with a Christian lobby group that includes dubious psychotherapist Valerie Sinason, MPs and Lords, who appeared to want Green to sex up the satanic side of the story in to a “satanic panic” like they did in the 90s, although was subsequently debunked?

It is now clear that the scandal in this case is not the abuse of an innocent down syndrome girl, but the exploitation of an innocent down’s syndrome girl by snake oil salesmen, dubious activists, Christian fantasists, psychological manipulators, and delusional truthers who have become blind believers of an incompetent alternative media, just like the mainstream “sheep” they condemn!

Everyone has their vested interest. Whether it’s David Icke using the story to prop up his flimsy claims of widespread Satanic Ritual abuse among the wealthy elite, Brian Gerrish & the UK Column lauding it as another example in their crusade against the state, social services and family courts, or Belinda McKenzie (former landlady of MI5 Messiah David Shalyer) adding it to her long list of “activist” causes, the Hollie Greig story and its mythology has grown like a cancer in the truth-seeking movement.

Like a cancer, perhaps its whole purpose was to kill? Kill the credibility of a growing counter culture that always seems to find itself stumbling on to the right things, only for its “leaders” to become Messiahs, egotists or clichéd conspiracy goofs.

If the alternative media is going to retain any credibility, act now, expose the Hollie Greig Hoax!



– Have you ever invited Robert Green, Anne Greig, Brian Gerrish or other supporters of the Hollie Greig story on to your show for a rebuttal?

“No I have not, but just because I haven’t doesn’t prove Hollie Greig was abused by a gang of paedophiles for over a decade. The story put out by the aforementioned is well known and been regurgitated throughout the alternative media for years, so to imply I’m doing a disservice by giving the other side a fair hearing is an oxymoron. I have contacted the UK Column, including sending a physical letter in the past for other reasons and did not even get a response. The Hoax group have tried to engage in a debate many times only to be turned down or accused of all sorts of heinous things. It is the proponents of the story that do not wish to discuss what the Hoax group have brought forward.”

– If Hollie wasn’t abused why has a gag order been put on the story?

“This question contradicts the first one. If there was a gag order how could I talk to the aforementioned proponents of the story? In fact how could I legally publish articles about the story? However there is no gag order and like most of the information presented as fact in this case, this is another distortion. The only person legally prevented from talking about the case is Robert Green. Specifically he is no longer allowed to go around harassing and accusing innocent people of being paedophiles.” (Court Document)

– If Hollie wasn’t abused why was she paid compensation?

“The Criminal Injuries Compensation Authority (CICA) do not require a crime to have been proven in a court of law to make payment, they use their independent judgment and do not work to the same standard as police investigators etc. It would also be foolish to assume that because Hollie received a pay out, that this proves it was because a gang of satanic abusers, some of who can vanish from all known records, operating for over a decade, abused her. The CICA payout was based on Anne Greig’s story and the fact that Hollie was not a virgin, not on any particular evidence. While this seems odd, CICA have been criticized many times for paying out on flimsy claims. Their purpose is to quiet those that have been failed by the justice system and they do not care if some false claims are caught in the net. I personally do not rule out the possibility that Hollie could have been abused at some point in her life. But her mother, Robert Green and the alternative media talking heads have covered this possibility in a sea of nonsense.” (CICA Explained)

Home | Satanic Panic, WideShut Webcast     

RSS Facebook Twitter Youtube


  • Duncan

    Takes balls to speak out against those speaking out, you’ll be called an ‘infighter’ , a favourite phrase employed if you’re near the mark, I smelt a rat re; Hollie, pie n mash maloney et al and removed all my clips exept liz docherty’s, for a reason. Tis a tangled web indeed. Interesting read here


    • Brian

      I think that all conspiracy theorists should be challenged as many just tell you what they think you want to here.

      For example all you have to do is stand on a stage and call David Cameron a nasty name and they all cheer! Brian Gerrish!!!

      That’s not information that’s a show just like David Icke!

  • Paranoiaman

    Now we’ve gotten the “Hollie Greig” misdirection out of the way, we can start asking questions about the cover-up in the case of the Dunblane School shootings, the links to Members of Parliament, Police and other public figures, all sealed under a closure order, preventing any publication for 100 years.

  • PavlovsBITch

    Now that’s interesting. I was tracking the Greig story and the last I knew was of Robert Green’s alleged imprisonment. However, having been a past subscriber to UK Column’s paper, I smelled a rat the moment I discovered the David Icke connection on their links/affiliates. I questioned Mike Robinson on this via email and he confirmed that he supported Icke and saw no reason not to, whereby I began to seriously doubt that either he or Gerrish were the real deal which has, incidentally, been confirmed by viewing a couple of their you tube presentations – pathetic. I also found the alleged imprisonment of the chairman of the British Constitution party overblown and lacking credibility in that man’s account on subsequent ‘release’. It’s not that the events in the ‘Hollie Greig’ case do not happen on a regular basis – they certainly do – but that these ‘ex’ (ahem) military men and their limp-wristed lackeys are discrediting valid enquiry, research and exposure and if that be the case, shame on them and BLAME for the SAME on them! Certainly, there is enough circumstantial evidence against Icke to tar him and all his associations with the same brush.

    • Brian

      It’s important to apologize when you make a mistake. Brian Gerrish has not apologized and will be tarnished with the Hollie Greig story for ever!

      The same apples to David Icke and Bill Maloney and any others connected to it.

      It just goes to show how conspiracy theorists jump into anything that fits in with the theory they have and yet they all say they do research!

      Maybe the whole thing was a setup to make them all look stupid!!!

      • Veronica

        “Maybe the whole thing was a setup to make them all look stupid!!!”

        Good thought, Brian … but I really don’t think Anne Greig is that clever. No … what’s at play here is “arrogance” and “ego”, and the unwillingness to admit when one is wrong.

    • Veronica

      I have known all of these people personally (but will not longer have anything to do with them) … and I completely agree with you, PavlovsBITch. You have hit many nails completely on the head.

    • Charles

      Ever consider “kooks”…er…”rats” like David Icke may very well be inserted into truth/theory society in order to cast further dispersions on those that seek to expose the VERY REAL pedophilia epidemic that exists among many of the world’s powerful and elite? Yep…put someone that exhibits just enough vehemence and passion about exposing such entities and dash in just enough “kookiness” and VOILA! Highly effectively discredited!

  • alison b

    Ah But Wait! Could it be part of a wider plan! could this exploitation of a child!,… This vulturous example conspiracy story telling be made the conspirators; who wish to put people off the rising interest of conspiracy theories since the rise of the net being at the touch of a button.. trying to break its trend by making it unfashionable and stupid for believing and leaning towards perspectives which might accuse of question authority. Or to vilify the trends of questioning the system? or even more a way to water down information to a point that no one knows the truth, while also preserving the separation of scientific knowledge,and lexicon, as well as political knowledge as a language for the elite ;-)

  • TITO

    Hoax you better tell the Criminal Injuries then that they were hoaxed.

    The hoaxers seem to be struggling to make a case here

    Pie and Mash and the UK col whats in it for them?

    More importantly whats in it for the anonymous hoxers who are linked in with one Greg Watkins a disinfo agent if ever there was one ,with Ian Parker Joseph and Anna Racoon ,or is that Nundy .

    If it walks like a duck

    • Brian

      “The hoaxers seem to be struggling to make a case here”

      Robert Green was sending hate mail to people saying there is a paedophile in your street, that’s why he was sent to jail!

      “Pie and Mash and the UK col whats in it for them?”

      Don’t let the facts get in the way of a good story!

      • holliegreig justice

        the facts are clear abuse payout cover up

        Robert greens action don’t change that FACT


      • holliegreig justice

        facts ? abuse,fact,payout ,fact ,cover up,fact

      • mangnacartafuckall

        Brian tour blog seems to have run out of steam two years ago,but to sum up magna carta and the truthers are lying,that

      • http://holliegreigjustice.blogspot.co.uk/ holliegreig justice

        if you heard a girl saying jones the butcher had raped her and she had been paid 13900 for being abused if you were Jones neighbor would you not want to know?

    • Henry

      What’s in it for the Column? Really asking that? Money…fame..political power..which comes with a following. That is all BG is about.

      • holliegreig justice

        Aye right ,ask 100 people if they have heard about the Column,money ,what money ,have you seen their accounts? Naw!
        Political power what power do they have ,you could make the same case for this page
        The truth is she was abused they paid hush money tried to cover it uo,what ever anyone else did that’s the truth and the Hoaxers are working with the powers of the state to cover that up.

  • Ben

    Hello, new here, be nice!

    I have a few issues with the hoax part of this story, firstly i believe that Hollie was abused by person or persons unknown, at first the accusations of a high ranking pedophile ring seemed far fetched, however with the recent uncovering of J.S. and the building story and body of evidence around the elm guest house and with the number of dead MPS (C.S) that are being accused the scenario is looking more and more plausible, there is also the point that the CPS decided to pay H.G. compensation money, around £13,000, now this was paid in because the belief was that although there was no physical evidence of abuse, it was backed up by phycological reports from independent organisations (DSA) and that it would be unfair to put H.G. through the trauma of giving evidence and given here disability her ability at appear as a credible witness may be called into question, causing further distress.
    As someone who has worked with adults with learning disabilities and especially D.S. for the past 20 years and is the father of a child with D.S. i consider myself somewhat of an expert on the abilities and level of understanding that these people are capable of, now like every individual there are a wide range of differences between our abilities, the same is said for people with Downs, some are unable to function in the most basic way unaided while others are capable of holding down jobs and living quite independently, i would say Hollie is just below the higher end of the scale, in short she would qualify for assisted living, that means she could live in a group home but with minimal support throughout the day, could she fabricate a story like this doubtful but more importantly could she maintain this story over a period of time, again id have to say very doubtful, although it can be easy to manipulate and “put words into someone mouth” who has D.S. it would be nearly impossible for them to constantly maintain this story over a long period of time, nearly impossible, i suppose with the right conditioning and time and ipcress file type brain washing it could be done.
    But then you come back to the reports done by the D.S.A., backed H.G. in her story, these people are the experts.

    I suppose the question is why would someone make this up, the murder of some people involved cannot be denied, the strong response of the Scottish government towards R.G. cannot be denied and now we have very clear links and evidence of high ranking pedophile rings operating using vulnerable children for there own gratification and influencing investigations into there crimes, then theres the payment of compensation to H.G. all fairly good indicators that something happened.
    My other issue is why is it some people can believe that there was a cover up in the dunblane case, where 17 people/children were killed but think its unfeasible for there to be a pedophile ring operating in government?
    Also there is the issue of social services near constant effort to remove H.G. from her mother, which if i’m i correct they have succeeded in doing, soon as the appeal process has been exhausted.

    Finally, i should say that i have meet H.G. while supporting her through a court process, just morally not in a professional capacity, i spent time talking to her, (not about the abuse) we discussed her schooling, favourite foods, current events and her hopes for christmas.
    R.G. iv never meet,
    A.G. i have to say was quite nice, as one parent of a D.S. child to another but showing sigh’s of extreme stress.

    Thank you for staying with me, i find your site to be a useful source of information.

    • Keelan Balderson

      Welcome, I always think it’s careless to lump two stories together. Because A) happened doesn’t prove B) happened. With the Jimmy Savile case there is a vast body of corroborative information, not so with Hollie Greig. The basic story presented by talking heads like Robert Green and Brian Gerrish are as baseless as people they claim abused her aren’t even real people, just random names with connections that aren’t true. For example Sheriff Buchanan doesn’t have a sister so abuse could not have taken place at his sister’s house. And where was this house even supposed to be?

      As somebody who has worked with Downs Syndrome children you will of course understand that Robert Green’s claim that they cannot lie, is a lie.

      The story is not coming from Hollie, she has only made a few appearances where she’s discussed the case herself. The rest comes from Anne. Robert and the alternative media machine.

      And the question is not why would they lie, the question is can what they say be proven? Why they’d lie is irrelevant. People get deluded every day for umpteen different reasons.

      It is my understanding that the payout was based on a lack of information provided by Anne. If they were aware of the whole story it may not have happened. That system of payouts itself has been criticized.

      I for one don’t rule out that Hollie may have been abused at some point during he school years, perhaps in an isolated incident, but we’ll never know the truth because of this baseless campaign that has clouded everything with nonsense.

      • Ben

        Thank you for the civil reply, im in agreement that R.G. is perhaps one of the worst representatives for anybody, whilst i think his determination to find out the truth is nobel but misguided there are some striking and very basic mistakes/errors he has made that given his self appointed post of spokesperson for H.G. he should have known better, both the lying and sheriff relations issues could have been disproven with some simple research, saving some time and face for the people involved.
        Im also in agreement with you about the dangers of lumping two different cases together, however it was used as an example of how the for along time people dismissed the stories of J.S. and Elm guest house as paranoid delusions or fantasy, simply to be proven that there is/ was high level, influential pedophiles operating and co operating with each other, they may not be directly related but there are more than a few similarities between the stories.
        As i said i’m basing my own beliefs on my own findings and interactions with H.G., the reports filed by the DSA the pay out and a feeling that something isn’t right, I’m also willing to accept that my own work and family may cloud my judgement.

        Anyway, thanks you Keelan for giving me the opportunity to discuss, you’ve given me some points to think about.

  • Stephen

    The way the elite pedophile network operate is to label anyone a conspiracy theorist who tries to expose them. David Icke has been right about many things, yet people still remain up their arrogant backsides. Soon the elite pedophiles will be exposed.

    • Keelan Balderson

      It’s not arrogant to ask David Icke for proof for some of his wilder claims. His books are very poorly sourced if at all. We jump all over the mainstream media whne they get something wrong or spin a topic, but then often let the alternative say what the hell they like and take it as gospel. There’s a reason why Icke always says at the beginning of his talks “Don’t believe me, you don’t have to believe what I say”…because it’s reverse psychology. And I like Icke, he’s linked to this site many times, he’s very inspiring, BUT he’s not beyond criticism.

      • 8thColour

        Icke is a charlatan and a conman whose only interest is increasing revenue for the business Family Icke.

        His treatment of employees who have worked hard to make him a very rich man is shocking. He’s not a nice man.

        • ohTheIrony

          Here we are on a discussion about the importance of not making wild allegations (amongst other things) and what do you go and do? That’s right, post wild allegations about someone, without any evidence! Boy oh boy…

          • 8thColour

            A little hard to post all the evidence on an internet comments page, but if you speak to the ex-employees he sacked (Sean, John-Paul) then you can have the above allegation confirmed from the horses mouth. Also ask Ian R Crane to see a copy of an email exchange between him and Icke concerning when Icke sacked John-Paul, shortly after he had made his web site financially successful, and come back to me and tell me Icke is not an egotistical dick.

    • KeepCalm

      david icke has been right on a lot of things and i like the guy, doesnt mean he’s right about everything. there’s a big difference between giving icke a chance to make his case and listening to his side, and someone who believes everything he says. after all, if things are as confusing and weird as he says (i have read his books and seen him live) wouldn’t it be incredibly suspicious if he had EVERY single thing right?

  • Ada

    If it was an elaborate hoax, wouldn’t the gagging order have been lifted to dis-credit the dis-creditors?

    • Keelan Balderson

      There is no gag order.

      • holliegreig justice

        Theres no reporting it either,except by the Firm and the Drum and the P and J despite being the most expensive BOP trial in Scotlands history,except for Leaskeys fit up job!

        • http://holliegreigjustice.blogspot.co.uk/ holliegreig justice

          stv covered rustys case and managed tae miss out any mention of hollie or Robert their lawyers,lavy macrae

  • tito



    • Keelan Balderson

      And why is that?

      • Sonia Greig

        Hi am not sure if you can help me but we being myself and my husband Gary Greig have been trying to get in contact with his Auntie Anne Greig. If you can help just even get a message to her please email me any help would be gratefully received we have tried very hard to reach her and the sooner the better. Regards Sonia and Gary

        • Keelan Balderson

          Hey Sonia unfortunately we don’t have any direct contact with Anne, and those that do aren’t in the habit of talking to us. I wish I could be of more help.

  • Dan

    A story full of fabrication and lies. Robert Green is nothing but an attention seeker. This ‘story’ has no substance or evidence that links together. What is worse here is that several innocent peoples names and reputations have been tarnished because of Robert Green’s actions.

  • Veronica

    15th February, 2014

    Well done Keelan! She’s still at it … the latest from Belinda (forwarded it to me … although I knew her pretty well, I’m not on her list):

    “Dear All

    Following a ‘solemn’ hearing of the charge yesterday afternoon (‘solemn’ is more serious than ‘summary’ under Scottish law) Robert was retained on remand and was taken to Perth Prison late yesterday evening.

    (Reason for Perth is that Aberdeen/Craiginches where he was before is closed so prisoners automatically get transferred there.)

    The proceedings against him will resume on Friday 21st February back in Aberdeen, support is needed, please!

    His prison number is the same as before in case anyone wishes to write to him – Robert Green No.125799 HMP Perth, 3 Edinburgh Road Perth PH2 8AT Phone 01738 622293 but they are not answering calls, we can imagine why.

    URGENT: a solicitor is needed to represent Robert on Friday, needs obviously to be based in Scotland and/or familiar with Scottish law. My assumption that the charge ‘Breach of a Non-Harassment Order’ relates to the ‘perpetual interdict’ (= ‘permanent injunction’) placed on him against ‘harassment’ of a certain person may or may not be correct, the solicitor will be able to find that out.

    Please get in touch asap if you know anyone who might be able to take this on?

    Thanks again for all the emails/messages, I’ll try to answer but bear with me!


    Robert Green never learns.

  • you evil bastards

    sounds like a bunch of pedos here…

    • http://holliegreigjustice.blogspot.co.uk/ holliegreig justice


    • Ironic

      The irony of you being here too will clearly be lost on you.

  • Debt Slave


  • http://holliegreigjustice.blogspot.co.uk/ holliegreig justice



    The information below is based on extensive interviews by Robert Green with Anne and Hollie Greig and on papers, reports and documents relevant to the Hollie Greig case.

    Hollie Greig is now a young woman of 34 and has Down’s Syndrome. Nevertheless, she is a competent and truthful witness, accepted as such by the state who paid her £13,500 through the Criminal Injuries Compensation Authority, for her suffering through multiple and ritual sexual abuse.

    Unusually and possibly uniquely, there is no official record of any crime ever having been committed against her. Documents on which the C.I.C.A. relied included one in which her father and brother were unequivocally alleged to be her abusers. !t was also stipulated that she was “probably abused by others who had access to her.”

    The events took place in Aberdeen, Scotland and despite Hollie clearly identifying her alleged abusers, her father was interviewed on one occasion only and her brother two years later. Hollie had revealed to her mother that she had been repeatedly ritually abused at various satanist ceremonies which she was forcibly taken to and that she had even witnessed the satanist ritual murder of an adult male.

    No action was taken whatsoever by Grampian Police and none of the other alleged abusers were ever interviewed. The nature of the abuse being what it is, Hollie witnessed and named seven other alleged child victims. Three expert medical witnesses, whose statements all fully supported Hollie’s allegations were also ignored by the police and in fact, their evidence was deliberately withheld from an official Police Complaints Commission inquiry several years later.

    This horrific sequence of events only came to light in 2000, when Hollie was twenty. After her mother, Anne Greig, suffering violence by her husband, fled the family home, Hollie, who was with her, began to relate the details of this staggering affair. Not only had Hollie told of her father and brother’s alleged assaults, but also named a further 20 alleged ritual abusers to the police, including a senior police officer, a local sheriff (judge), her head teacher, her own female Social Services

    carer, medical staff and a variety of other professionals. Some time later Hollie named another alleged ritual abuser who is the Head Teacher of a school but this name has yet to be shared with the police as they refuse to investigate the case.

    Eleven days after Hollie had made her statement to the police in 2000, a party of ten, on the instructions of Social Services, dragged Anne Greig from the flat she shared with Hollie, forcibly injected her and took her unconscious to the local mental institution. Social Services then sent Hollie back to her allegedly abusive father.

    Fortunately, Anne Greig, showing great presence of mind in this most terrifying situation, managed to free herself from the institution quickly and rescue her daughter. Dr Alastair Palin, at the institution, originally diagnosed Anne as having schizophrenia. Anne, with legal support, quickly had herself fully analysed by an eminent professional, Dr Margaret Smith, who concluded that there existed no grounds whatsoever to support claims that Anne had any significant mental disorder. Dr Palin, when confronted, then had no option but to agree with Dr Smith.

    One of the effects of having Down’s Syndrome is that those with the condition generally have long and vivid memories, are not given to false statements or

    embellishments, but do not have a concept of time. Hence, through a process of elimination, Anne was able to discover that Hollie’s abuse must have begun from the age of six. Hollie had spent fourteen years enduring these ordeals after being threatened with her own death and that of her pet dog, who she loved very much, if Hollie ever told her mother.

    On 17`h November 1997, Hollie’s devoted uncle and brother of Anne, Robert David Greig,had been found dead in a stationary burning car in a remote lane outside Aberdeen. There was no real explanation at the time for his death. He had no serious problems of any kind that were known about and was a pleasant and well-liked man with no history of depression or any similar disorder. Anne, despite being his next-of-kin, was repeatedly refused a copy of his autopsy, which was not provided until late 2009. She was suspicious, but had nothing to go on and the police and fire service made no enquiries about foul play, despite Anne’s discomfiture about the statement of an attempted “rescuer”, who much later was discovered to be known to Hollie’s father.

    In 2001, Hollie told her mother that her uncle had once walked in to find Hollie allegedly being sexually abused by her father. The father had allegedly threatened to kill Robert Greig. Again, by calculating the time of this event, it was concluded that this alleged occurrence took place shortly before Robert’s mysterious death.

    It is only fairly recently that it has been possible to piece together what is likely to have happened on the night of 17th November 1997. The death certificate had merely stated that Robert had died of smoke inhalation. However, when the autopsy, after every possible evasion by the authorities, came to light on 31st December 2009, it was discovered that some of Robert’s ribs and sternum had been broken and he had damage to his skull. It seemed, on that evidence only, that foul play should have been suspected at the time and that a full investigation ought to have been ordered. The prospect of suicide should not have been considered as a likely possibility. Very few people kill themselves in this manner as it is too painful and in fact, Grampian Police confirmed that last month that only one suicide in its area in the past ten years had been attributed to this method of burning oneself to death.

    Since then, our enquiries have found that the police and Crown Office have “lost” the records and the fire service has refused to hand over full documentation. This lack of information did not prevent the Crown Office, in 2011, as describing the death as a suicide. However, quite apart from other issues that would take too long to explain briefly, the NHS has just advised us that they have no record of the police or anyone else requesting the medical records that would have been essential before declaring such a death as suicide.

    In addition, there appears to have been an insurance fraud perpetrated on Scottish Widows by Hollie’s father and others who received a payout on Robert’s death.

    There can be little doubt that Robert Greig was simply murdered in order to silence him, as his testimony would have unravelled the activities of the ring, certainly including the systematic use of ritual abuse.

    The next and obvious question is to ask exactly why the Scottish authorities and justice system have not only refused to conduct a full, open and independent inquiry but have also adopted a blatant policy of persecuting and threatening Anne and Hollie Greig and others, including myself, who have taken up the case and questioned the powers-that-be in Scotland. Shortly after the story becoming widely-known in 2010, attacks were made by Shropshire Council on the home that the two

    ladies had fled to from Scotland and legal threats were also placed against them, despite a total lack of evidence to justify such actions. Whilst the ladies were taking a short holiday in June 2010, a combination of police and council staff actually broke in, raided and vandalised their home in a blatant act of intimidation, pointing to the existence of a possible network operating in our justice and public services to protect influential rings of satanist ritual abusers and paedophiles.

    After taking up the case in late 2008, I quickly discovered that despite overwhelming and compelling evidence, the mainstream media were being pressurised into suppressing the affair. On 19th April 2009, the News of the World did publish a brief summary, which was followed by enormous pressure being put upon the editor by the Crown Office. Soon afterwards, BBC Scotland commissioned two programmes on the case, after examining all the documentary evidence, but three of its senior journalists were later warned off and threatened, by whom, the journalists were too terrified to say.

    On 3rd October 2009, in an attempt to break this impasse, I called a public meeting in Edinburgh and named all those identified as abusers by Hollie. No one took any legal action against me, but significantly Elish Angiolini, then Lord Advocate, issued on her private behalf, severe legal threats to the mainstream media throughout Scotland and beyond, even to Google, warning them of dire consequences if anyone mentioned the Hollie Greig case and Mrs Angiolini’s personal involvement, which we had already established in the following way.

    At the time that Hollie reported the members of the group of ritual abusers to Grampian Police, on 25th August 2000, followed shortly afterwards by Anne’s abduction, Elish Angiolini was Area Procurator Fiscal, based in Aberdeen and was a known associate of the sheriff named as a ritual abuser by Hollie. It was Mrs Angiolini who quashed any investigation.

    In the summer of 2009, I wrote to the Crown Office about this issue and was informed that Mrs Angiolini knew nothing about Hollie’s case. However, we held letters from MSP Brian Adam to Mrs Angiolini asking about the case and a moreover, a headed letter with Mrs Angiolini’s name on it dated 12`h July 2001, directly referring to the case. I thus informed – including the incriminating documents – First Minister Alex Salmond and Justice Secretary Kenny MacAskill of the false statement made by the Lord Advocate relating to a case of the most grave concern. I believed Mrs Angiolini’s position was thus untenable. The two senior ministers did nothing at all.

    When Mrs Angiolini threatened the media later, it was through law firm Levy & McRae, who have close links to Mr MacAskill. It has become clear since that Mrs Angiolini, whilst in office as Lord Advocate, may have allegedly misappropriated public funds for her own personal use and potential financial gain. She has repeatedly refused formal questions from the Freedom of Information Commissioner as to how Levy & McRae was paid for its services. Elish Angiolini left office on 5 May 2011 with this matter still unresolved.

    Meanwhile, in order to bring the Hollie Greig case to the attention of the people of Aberdeen, whose children were clearly potentially at risk from the gang of satanist ritual abusers, who by now appeared to have state protection, l decided to stand for Parliament in the 2010 General Election, to represent Aberdeen South, where most of the atrocities occurred.

    On 12th February, during my first visit to the city to meet voters and the local media, I was seized half an hour before the time of the rendezvous by two plain clothes

    police officers, handcuffed and thrown into solitary confinement for four days in Queen St. Police Station, refused all legal representation, charged with a Breach of the Peace and only freed after having the most onerous and disproportionate bail conditions imaginable placed upon me, which included my being banned from Aberdeen and its surrounding county and from placing before the electorate the fundamentals of my campaign. Thus, l became the first person in parliamentary history to be banned from the constituency he wished to represent and to have the electorate deprived of knowing the reason for my standing in elections. It is almost beyond belief that such a thing could happen in a so-called mature and open democracy. The actions against me resembled those one might expect in Hitler’s Germany or Stalin’s Soviet Union. My home in Cheshire was simultaneously raided by Grampian Police whilst I was placed in custody and all privileged documents seized. I was even arrested again by Grampian Police in my home town in an attempt to prevent me signing my election papers.

    In 2011, with most bail conditions still in force, thanks to the legal magazine The Drum’s publication of 11th July, based on documentary evidence provided, it was uncovered that Alex Salmond had, like Elish Angiolini before him, falsely denied knowledge of the Hollie Greig case. The documents quite clearly established that the First Minister had lied about his awareness of the horrific crimes that had taken place in a neighbouring constituency.

    It is for the people of Scotland to decide, of course, but I have little doubt that once the public are in full possession of the facts, the First Minister and Justice Secretary will have no option but to resign from their respective offices.

    It is surely now beyond all reasonable doubt that Mr Salmond, Mr MacAskill, Mrs Angiolini and many other public officials have failed in their duties to the probable extent of systematically obstructing the course of justice in regard to some of the most appalling crimes in Scottish history. Many of us have spoken out publicly about this and some of us, including Hollie and Anne Greig,have been persecuted by the state for doing so.

    This is a dreadful issue that is known throughout the world and is of the greatest shame to our country. Which elected politicians possess sufficient courage, decency and integrity to demand the minimum reasonable requirement, that of an open, full and independent inquiry into all aspects of the Hollie Greig case and those related to it? In addition there should be a full and impartial police investigation into the satanist ritual abuse network which has been identified by Hollie Greig, not only to obtain justice for Hollie but also to rescue and protect those who are currently being abused by this satanist coven.

    Hollie Greig has to date named 23 alleged satanist ritual abusers and shared 22 of these names with the police. In addition 7 names of apparent victims of the alleged satanist ritual abusers have been given to the police. But 13 years after Hollie first started exposing these crimes the police continue to refuse to conduct any proper, transparent and thorough investigation into her allegations.

    The police have only ever interviewed 2 of the suspects at most and did not bother to even check if their computers contained any evidence of possession of child pornography, which is common practice by those investigating suspected child abusers. The police have also refused to interview any of the 7 alleged victims identified by Hollie.

    Since the police began to re-investigate the case by interviewing Hollie on 8 September 2009 in my presence, the police have confirmed on oath in court that not even one of those named by Hollie at that interview has been questioned.

    Since that time a copy of a police intelligence document dated 8 May 2007 has come into my possession. It was obtained under the Freedom of Information Act. It specifically states:

    “ Police searched their intelligence for details of Denis Mackie and Greg Mackie:-

    …………………..They are both believed to have a predilection towards very young girls.”

    But despite being in possession of this information, since the writing of that intelligence report the police have refused to interview those two individuals and to examine their computers for possible child pornography and possible links to other suspected abusers.

    The Scottish police should be very strongly pressured to thoroughly investigate the serious allegations of satanist ritual abuse and ritual human sacrifice which have been made by Hollie Greig. Failure to do this exposes other vulnerable young people and children to the horrific abuse of this large and influential satanist coven which Miss Greig has identified.

    Prepared by: Robert Green in October 2013

    • WhatALoon

      Robert Green is a mental case.

  • Fiona Broadhurst

    Anyone who believes this crap is a complete mug, I’m from Aberdeen so know the background to this & this hoax has it’s roots in a kid that went missing back in the summer of 1979. Can’t remember the exact details, but she had down’s syndrome & was found about 10 days after she went missing. Many rumours spread about what happened to her at the time, these were soon dispelled & it turned into a 7-day wonder & was soon forgotten about. Her name most certainly was NOT “Hollie Greig” (who as far as I understand does not even exist) & was never even reported outside the local media. In fact I’d totally forgotten about this event until this “Hollie Grieg” bullshit appeared on the web, & it took me a while to make the connection, that somehow a case of a missing kid had evolved become a “cause celebre” for abuse fantasists

    • http://holliegreigjustice.blogspot.co.uk/ holliegreig justice

      YOU ARE a fucking mental

Copyright © 2015
eXTReMe Tracker     Privacy Policy