It’s not enough to have a full blown media campaign, the complicity of schools or to plaster the cancerous death of celeb Jade Goody on every newspaper; girls in Britain are now being bribed with £45 worth of high street shopping vouchers in exchange for rolling up their sleeve and taking the HPV vaccination, that allegedly prevents cervical cancer.

As reported by Mail Online:
The shopping voucher scheme is being run by Birmingham East and North primary care trust, and costs around £22,500 a year.

It offers ‘Love to Shop’ vouchers to girls aged 16 to 18 which can be spent at high street stores. They receive a total of £45 worth of vouchers for turning up for all three injections against the HPV virus.

The trust was advised by Mark Brighton, who used to work for Sainsbury’s Nectar card but has now set up a company called Healthy Incentives.

While the framed mainstream media debate is focused on whether the vaccine will encourage girls to be more promiscuous, the real debate should be whether the vaccine does what it claims and whether the vaccine is dangerous.

Although it is often called the Cervical Cancer vaccine, there is actually no such thing as a cervical cancer vaccine. It’s actually a vaccination against certain strains of the Human Papilloma Virus (HPV); which is suggested as a cause of cervical cancer. Thus the logic is that preventing HPV will prevent cancer.

However the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA), has quietly admitted that the majority of HPV cases have no direct link to cancer!

As reported by NaturalNews.com:
The FDA news release of March 31, 2003 acknowledges that “most infections (by HPV) are short-lived and not associated with cervical cancer”, in recognition of the advances in medical science and technology since 1988. In other words, since 2003 the scientific staff of the FDA no longer considers HPV infection to be a high-risk disease when writing educational materials for the general public whereas the regulatory arm of the agency is still bound by the old classification scheme that had placed HPV test as a test to stratify risk for cervical cancer in regulating the industry.

“Most women who become infected with HPV are able to eradicate the virus and suffer no apparent long-term consequences to their health.”

Furthermore Dr. Diane Harper, lead researcher in the development of two brands of HPV vaccine told the International Public Conference on Vaccination in October last year that 70 percent of all HPV infections resolve themselves without treatment within a year. [1] – if anyone should know it’s her.

Nearly all sexually active women have the HPV virus. As reported by the BBC:
It would only work in females who have not yet become sexually active. This is because HPV is transmitted through sexual intercourse.

Cervarix, the brand of jab most commonly used in the UK states on its information pack:
CERVARIX has not been demonstrated to provide protection against disease from vaccine and non-vaccine HPV types to which a woman has previously been exposed through sexual activity. [2]

It’s counterpart Gardasil also makes the warning. [3]

This is quite alarming when we consider some states in the US are pushing for the vaccine to mandatory and people from other countries that want to be citizens are forced to take the jab. In the UK it is pushed on young women often regardless of sexual activity; which itself is a personal topic and sometimes difficult to discuss.

So to recap we have a vaccine that is being heavily promoted as a prevention of cancer, when 70% of women who get HPV don’t develop cancer; which is also in some cases being promoted to females that have likely already been exposed to the HPV virus through sexual activity.

The bombshell however is that in some cases the vaccine itself can INCREASE the risk of cancer!

Information from the Gardasil manufacturer presented to the FDA prior to the vaccine’s approval states that “if you have been exposed to HPV 16 or 18 prior to injection and take the vaccine, you increase your risk of precancerous lesions, or worse, by 44.6%” [4]

So considering a high percentage of sexually active women of all ages have the HPV you would think a screening process would be undertaken before they get the jab to ensure they don’t fall in to the above category? Wrong.

“Currently, testing for human papilloma virus (HPV) infection is not generally available on request through the NHS.” [5]

If one uses common sense it would be extremely foolish to take the HPV jab if you have been sexually active because you’re actually increasing your odds of developing cancer!

Furthermore the HPV vaccine only protects against four strains of HPV; two that can cause genital warts, and two that are associated with cervical cancer in some women.

Just because your child gets the HPV vaccine doesn’t necessarily mean he or she is protected from genital warts or cancer

There are more than 100 HPVs, 30 of which are known to cause cancer or genital warts. Since Gardasil and Cervarix only protect against two cancer-causing HPVs and two wart-causing HPVs, that means you can still get cervical cancer or genital warts from the other HPVs.

Also, according to Dr. Diane Harper in the Huffington Post, data shows that the vaccine only protects against genital warts for a little over two years.

Side effects from the vaccine are some of the worst out there. They include gastrointestinal symptoms including nausea, vomiting, diarrhoea and abdominal pain; hives, fever, upper respiratory tract infections, dizziness, a complete anaphylactic reaction and in many recorded cases it can cause permanent damage and even DEATH!

India halted their vaccine campaign in the Summer when 4 girls died and 120 were injured after taking the shots. [6]

“The programme is part of a two-year study to look into the utility of a vaccine in public health programmes and acceptability of Gardasil, the human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine made by Merck. Gardasil, available in medical stores across the country, is marketed in India by MSD Pharmaceuticals Pvt Ltd.

The programme was marred by controversy after four deaths and complications among 120 girls were reported after vaccination. The girls complained of stomach disorders, epilepsy, headaches and early menarche. Women activists fear the vaccine may impact the mental health of girls who have shown no signs of distress so far.”

News stories have been hitting America for three years about the dangers of the vaccine. Stories like this one in 2007 Did Gardasil Vaccine Cause a 12-yr-old Girl’s Paralysis and Girl Dies after HPV Jab – CDC Blame Birth Control Pill.

A 16-year-old girl lost nearly all of her vision within 10 days of receiving the second course of her vaccine against the human papilloma virus (HPV), reports a case study in the Journal of Child Neurology.

Britain has had it’s own share of stories. The most famous about the 14 year old girl that died after taking the vaccination. [7]

Of course the media were then quick to point out that she had “underlying health problems”, but that doesn’t negate the fact that the vaccine tipped her over the edge. Where’s the media campaign warning people with existing health problems NOT to take the vaccine? It can’t be a very safe vaccine if it only works on people in tip-top condition that can withstand the myriad of dangerous side effects.

Two European women died in 2008 following the vaccine. [8]

Two women have died shortly after receiving the new vaccine for human papilloma virus (HPV) that is being used in massive vaccination programmes in Europe. The European Medicines Agency (EMEA) did not disclose the women’s names, but has reported that the deaths occurred in Austria and Germany.

Concerned mothers whose daughters have been injured or killed by the HPV vaccine but silenced by the media have put together a website that documents the truth about how the vaccine has killed and injured thousands of young girls since it was introduced in 2006. Thousands of teenagers have suffered adverse reactions and at least 71 have died from the vaccine since the HPV program according to the site – http://truthaboutgardasil.org/

A smaller but no less alarming number of deaths was reported in the UK’s Sunday Express:
Authorities in the UK should be on the alert because its sister vaccine, Gardasil, used in America, has already been associated with 32 deaths.

This ultimately boils down to common sense. Drug companies are in the business of making money, and will often put this before the effectiveness of their drugs and vaccines. Is it really worth taking a vaccine with horrible side effects that protects against only a few strains of a relatively benign virus, that rarely causes cancer, only to increase the risk of cancer in some cases?