Tomorrow through Monday, Hillary Clinton and foreign minsters representing the G20 countries will be having an unofficial meeting in Los Cabos, Mexico, to discuss some of the major roadblocks preventing the effective implementation of Global Governance, and some of the pretexts used to promote it. Mexico hosts the full G20 event in June.

According to the Business Standard, topics of discussion will include trans-national crime, green growth, climate change and food security.

Food scarcity and climate change have long been used as pretexts to offer corporatist solutions; such as the expansion of Monsanto’s GMO crops throughout the world, and the push for global carbon taxes to consolidate power for a few elite corporations, but the concept of trans-national crime appears to be fairly new. Will that be used as pretext for global policing? Only time will tell.

The event is being organized by Patricia Espinosa-Cantellano, the Minister of Foreign Affairs for Mexico. Using the contrived economic collapse as an example, she claims there is: “a global governance gap, one that the G20 is called upon to bridge…Having the foreign ministers of some of the most active countries in international affairs discussing openly and freely ways to improve global governance should be a welcome step forward.” At what point democracy and sovereignty comes in to play is not clear. It certainty won’t happen with unelected High Representative for EU Superstate Foreign Affairs, Catherine Ashton on the attendee list.

Cantellano sensationally went on to say: The world is running out of time as it faces major challenges in a number of fronts that demand concerted action.”

Perhaps what really demands concerted action is exposing the root causes of these so called challenges. While climate change is an over-hyped non-issue, the world really does face a bleak economic future. However centralizing control, without bringing the banksters to justice and overhauling the way the system operates, is only going to produce tyranny. Does it make any logical sense to talk about global currencies or more power to the IMF/World Bank, with the same crooks at the helm? Streamlining the system will just make the ponzi-scheme easier to operate. Using the World Bank and IMF in more countries, will just mean more countries are in debt to the banks. And that means the people of those countries will suffer, because their labour is the collateral on the debt.

Addressing the world food problem with never ending aid, or allowing one mega-corporation to push its controversial GMOs, again overlooks the root issue. The majority of impoverished countries are only stuck that way because the powerful countries and the corporations that are based there, exploit them for resources, and the IMF/World Bank extend them loads they can’t pay back. The answer isn’t more interference it’s less.

When a farmer is working for pennies to cultivate food that is exported to the West instead of feeding his own family, or when kids are forced to mine minerals for transnational corporations to produce electronics, is the answer to take more of their sovereignty away? No, the answer is to give it back.

Unfortunately these basic tenets of freedom will never cross the mind of the control freak suits of the G20.

Cantellano flufflily concludes:
“The ultimate goal of the forthcoming Ministerial meeting at Los Cabos is to seek new actions that can help us fulfill more effectively our global responsibilities for the benefit of each of our societies and of the world community as a whole.”

See…it’s their duty to control the world. We must thank them.

Mainstream Coverage @ Business Standard & China Daily

*You can stay up to date with WideShut using our RSS Feed, Twitter, Facebook & Youtube