Britain To Ban Skirts For School Uniforms In Case Transexuals Are Offended?
Mar 1st, 2010 | By Keelan Balderson | Category: Big Brother, Featured Articles, PoliticsIn another case of 1984 Doublethink, where society holds two contradictory beliefs at the same time, the Equality and Human Rights Commission has issued a document claiming that it may be illegal for schools to have skirts as part of the school uniform because it might offend transgenders and transvestites, which are oh so rampant in our school system – that last line was sarcastic in case you didn’t know.
As reported in the Daily Mail:
The threat to take legal action against schools because some uniforms can be deemed ‘gender specific’ is beyond satire. The number of transsexual adults in Britain is tiny, perhaps as few as 5,000, yet the Commission wants all public services to be altered for the sake of this minuscule group.
And here lies the problem with this hypocritical extreme left politically correct nonsense. In an effort to bring equality and rights to everyone, what we are really seeing is mass discrimination against everyone. Instead of bringing people together we are dividing society because this group might offend that group. I guess we should just make everything illegal so nobody can become offended about anything. But then again I’m offended that people might be offended at girls wearing skirts.
Is it so difficult to just deal with such an issue if and when it crops up? So there might be one girl in England that is having a tough time dealing with these issues. Isn’t that for the school and parents to work through together? Why have a piece of paper declaring such a sweeping proposal as banning skirts?
The article continues: Such action highlights three of the most dangerous traits of the Left-wing doctrinaires. One is their remorseless focus on categorising individuals by race, gender, sexual orientation or class – and then placing them within hierarchies of victimhood according to the perceived disadvantage they have suffered.
Another is the sexualisation of children, in which the innocence of youth is destroyed by the aggressive promotion of the so-called ’sexual rights’ agenda.
The third is the eagerness to obliterate all traditional morality by presenting support for normal, married family life as outmoded and discriminatory.
One alleged plank of the New World Order social engineering agenda historically was to break down the family unit by funding and promoting the feminist movement, while disenfranchising the traditional male archetype. Another pillar was to make vast amounts of people dependent on the state through the benefits system.
In some scary rhetoric Harriet Harman has said in regard to her equality bill that it will create ‘a new social order’. Every office, factory, club and pub will have to submit to the ideology of the state.
It seems as we become more and more dependent on the state, there will be an increasing push to adopt their ideologies, rather than the state simply representing the collective ideologies of the public.
“Power is tearing human minds apart and putting them back together in new shapes of your own choosing.”
George Orwell’s – 1984
I think trousers should also be banned in case transexuals are offended for school uniforms, uniforms should have kilts for all sexes male, female, transexuals or not sure. Is it not irrelevant as when did they reintroduce uniforms in British school as they were abolished in the 80’s when I was at school. Should books not be banned in school in case they offend the illiterate or stupid who will no doubt go on to become MPs.
Banning skirts for all is ridiculous. The better solution would be to simply allow those girls who genuinely feel as if they should be boys, dress in a boys’ uniform. The same accomodation should be allowed for boys who genuinely feel they were born the wrong gender. That would be an understanding and tolerant form of non-discrimination.
However it seems to me as if understanding and tolerance are no longer the goals of so-called “non-discrimination” agendas. Such movements have obviously been hijacked by the NWO for their own destructive purposes.
True understanding and tolerance come from the heart anyhow, not from the agendas of social engineers. We should seek to understand and to lessen the suffering of gay and transgender students, out of caring and love for our children. We should NOT allow politicians and petty officials to push nonsensical, homogenizing policies on OUR children, and ourselves. We don’t need to be forced to care at metaphorical gunpoint. We can care for and protect our OWN children and communities–as long as they don’t lock us up for it.
I don’t know about in Great Britain but in the United States some peoples religion prohibit girls from wearing pants. It just doesnt seem right to tell girls that their school uniforms can’t be skirts.