Share Bank of England, City of London and The Queen
Feb 13th, 2009 | By Keelan Balderson | Category: Economy, Editorials |
Print
One of the greatest deceptions in modern times is that the quaint little old Queen of England has no power and her role is purely ceremonial and for tradition. The fact is her role has not changed at all; just most of the Royal Family’s evil plans for world empire were hatched a long time ago in the old world. The British empire is still going strong, her common ancestors are in control of the US and the new world order. Now her majesty can sit back in her palace, relax and watch the world fall to bits, while the media paints a warm fuzzy picture of the family; who are in fact Nazi Germans.
The Queen is still Head of State and meets with important leaders from all around the world. One would assume they don’t talk about knitting or her pet corgis. Each day she receives documents and reports from Government ministers and Commonwealth officials. They must all be read and, if necessary, signed. So she is well aware of her country’s current affairs. She is also Head of the Armed Forces and is the only person that can declare war. Of course she meets with the prime-minister first, but it is still her duty and only hers.
The Queen meets Mr and Mrs Obama
On top of this she is Head of the Church of England. She appoints the archbishops and bishops; on what basis we can only imagine. In other words because she is the offspring of incestuous ancestors she is allowed to rule over people’s realtionship with God, just like the Pharaohs. It’s there in writing. “Elizabeth the Second, by the Grace of God of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland”. If God really did grace her with this position it would be nice to see the contract.
You don’t get any more elite in social circles than the Queen. The rich and powerful are just begging to be blessed with her astronomically wealthy presence. Tradition or not, Queenie is no innocent in anything. Somebody that asks for an extra £44m allowance during recession does not care about their people.
So where does her power end and the Government’s begin? Well the Government puppets do all the dirty work and the Queen signs the papers for the Government. Although she has more power than the majority believe, there is an even bigger power above both of these puppets. You guessed it, the private banking cartels that have a grip over the nation’s money. The Queen is fine, she is the richest land owner in the world and the bankers will always keep it that way; they have her family to thank for where they are today. The rest of us are not so lucky.
The Rothschild banking family is one of the most powerful, if not the most powerful family in the world; who rose to domination through the art of money changing. Money is the root cause of all evil; they are the route cause of all modern money!
Similar to Vatican City controlled by the Pope in Rome (another God appointed money hoarder), there is an independent state within London, known as the City of London. It is the richest square mile in the world, and London’s financial sector, housing banks and financial institutions from all major countries. The Governors of the city are called The Crown (deceptively nothing to do with the Queen), comprised of 13 members headed up by the Lord Mayor of the city (not the regular London Mayor). Today Ian Luder (of German decent like the Queen) is the allusive Lord Mayor, yet there is very little written of him online and his Wikipedia page is virtually empty. That’s because he wields incomprehensible power for the elites by manipulation of the economy.
Ian Luder, Mayor of the private City of London
The City of London is not part of England or the United Kingdom. It is a privately owned corporation masquerading as a county – often talking heads on TV will even call it London PLC. It isn’t under the power of the Queen or the Government. Her majesty and the Prime Minister are subordinate to the Lord Mayor and have to listen to him and his delegates on financial decisions; that is why during the financial news they always cut to “the City” for updates. If the Queen enters the Mayor’s city, she is met by him at the perimeter “Temple Bar” and must bow and ask permission to enter his private and sovereign state. He will dress in full regalia while she and her handlers dress in regular clothing. Get the idea? Even the old world Queen is a peasant to the new world order bankers. The city also has the pleasure of their own private police force, which is full of freemasons.
Along with the Rothschild family and their agents placed in various positions of financial power this secret mafia steer the world’s economy through the Bank of England, NM Rothschild & Sons and their web of private banks in all major nations. When an economic crash occurs it has most definitely been ordered from the City or across the pond by their associates at the Federal Reserve and Wall Street.
During a war you will never see the Vatican, City of London or Switzerland get attacked. On the grand chessboard these are considered neutral ground because it is where all the money flows. Without money to fund war, there is no war. Sitting somewhere in an ivory tower are the Rothschilds laughing at our stupidity. This happens right beneath our own noses!
Evelyn Rothschild was in a New York hotel on 9/11 – seemingly watching from his Ivory tower.
While the Queen and her Government have control over our every day lives, our increasingly fascist laws and the issues that seem to directly affect us. The Rothschild family, the Lord Mayor, the financial City of London and WallStreet privately operate our currency and financial affairs, the real controller of our lives. We are in economic collapse, now you know where to look.
Historically all British military colonies with white populations such as Australia, New Zealand, Canada and South Africa were under the authority of the Queen and her Government. Whereas all other brown “slave” colonies such as India, Egypt, Bermuda, Malta, Singapore, Hong Kong, Gibraltar and the African nations were the private property of the Crown, which is the separate board of the City of London. These colonies were exploited for slave labor and trade, to make the cartels richer and more powerful.
During the development of this two tiered British Empire the BRITISH EAST INDIA COMPANY (BEIC) owned by the CROWN began making a fortune through the Opium trade. One of their strategies was to get the vast impoverished Chinese population addicted to opium to create a mass market for the crop, while they also milked their exports at the same time. It didn’t matter to the Crown that China outlawed the drug. They wanted money and money they got.
The Royal Family also wanted their greedy claws on the profits so joined their counterparts in the CITY and negotiated a tax on the opium farmers in there Indian colony. Thus huge amounts of opium were shipped from India at a tax to China and the Royal Family added an enormous amount of money to their every increasing pot. Slaves in India produced the opium and gave them a cut for nothing, and impoverished laborers in China bought it to smoke while picking tea leaves for export back to Britain. Next time you pick up a box of teabags with the endorsement stamp “By appointment to Her Majesty the Queen”, spare a second for our Chinese neighbors.
The British Empire fighting China during the opium wars.
Now this was the 19th Century, not modern times, but over the years the operation became more sophisticated and secretive. Whole banks were created to launder the money, shipping companies were made to help hide the contents, and the corrupt institutions that are based out of the City of London and extend all over the globe still interface for world control and financial rule. From Bush’s Union Banking Corporation in America laundering Hitler’s finances, to the controlled collapse of the world’s economy in order to pool our tangible wealth, the bankers have always operated above the law, the state and modern royals.
The British may have had an enormous military empire in all corners of the globe, but the Crown and the City of London had their own economic empire that rules to this day. And that Empire started with the Bank of England.
Bank of England:
The Bank of England and its monstrous ancient temple of a building is the template for all big central banks that wish to perpetuate the global scam. Located in the private City of London the counterfeiting operation opened its doors in 1694 as an easy way for the Government to create finance. It was only later that the Rothschilds infiltrated the institution. The initial idea came from Scottish money changer William Paterson who some researchers claim was an initiate in to the Order of the Orange, a Merovingian Bloodline secret society developed by Dutch Freemason William of Orange.
Order of the House of Orange
Britain found it hard to find lenders with enough capital to meet their greed and warmongering debt issues, so when Paterson came along with a £1.2m loan they were more than happy to give him and his partners the exclusive rights to print the nation’s money and to continue loaning them money thereafter. Seemingly ignorant to the consequences of becoming indebted to private hands, Paterson was granted a 12 year charter, and thus the unethical monopoly London had over currency was now legally in the hands of Paterson…because they said so. Any independent free market bankers and traders would now lose out to the money changers.
While the royals used loans to extend the empire by force, the Bank used its economics to extend an empire by money and it wouldn’t take long for Britain to amass a dangerous level of national debt. It would increase every year and by 1844 the government owed the banksters over £11m. The original charter stated that after each term the government could sever ties with the bankers and go about their own issuance of currency, but because debt expanded each year under the weight of the system, they were hooked on a never ending fishing line of credit. It was eventually agreed that the bank could hold the monopoly until the government had paid them back. They have never come close to doing so, hence the ever increasing national debt and global private banking control today. Taxation goes to pay off the debt, not to fund public services.
Why does the Government allow this to go ahead, can’t they just tell them where to go?
Unfortunately it’s not that simple. The tentacles that the private banking cartels have spread around the globe are so interconnected with the entire economy and power structure that the Governments that are now in power are only puppets to the banks. There aren’t any true leaders left and probably very few that understand the system. After all they are more than happy to skim off the top in their expense accounts as hit the headlines in 2009. Gordon Brown the Prime Minister of England as of writing, granted the Bank of England operational independence to set interest rates in 1997 and sold all of the country’s gold overseas at knockdown prices before the economic crisis. You can see that they don’t much care about the situation.
Gordon Brown gave free reign to the Bank of England to set interest rates in 1997, now since the crash he is calling for a New World Order for the economy; coincidence?
You then have to factor in laws that have been developed over the years to accommodate the banking scam. You’re not even allowed to talk about the Bank in the house of commons. So how could you ever create a campaign to abolish it?
If Gordon Brown suddenly flip-flopped and said he was closing the Bank of England and all national debt is void, they’d lock him up. All the financial goons would want his head on a silver platter. The controlled media would probably spin it as if Gordon was about to destroy the world, and of course the world’s entire economy would feel the reverberations in the beginning.
It won’t be pretty when the system does come down, but we sure as hell cannot rely on our current leaders to do it for us.
*Remember you can stay updated with WideShut.co.uk on our RSS Feed, Twitter & Youtube - subscribe now!
You mention numerous facts in your article, but unfortunately, several of them are wrong. The Queen of Englands ancestors were indeed part German, but if you are “English” then you are also part German, Scandinavian, French, Gaul, Celt, Roman and or one of the many other groups of people that invaded the British Isles.
As far as anyone has proven the “English” are predominately descended from the Angles, Saxons and Jutes. The Angles, Saxons and Jutes are from the Juteland Peninsual (Modern day Denmark) and northern Germany. England is actually means Angleland or “Land of the Angles”.
In 1066 William the Conquerer invaded England. He was Norman (French). William brought in a nomerous noble and commoners who intermarried with the “Angles”. This developement was significantly different from what the “Angles” did approximately 600 years previously.
When the “Angles” invaded “England” they pushed out the people who occupied England. These people became the Welsh. They are descended from a mixture of Gauls, Celts and another group of invaders, the Romans. The Welsh language is very similar in nature to the language spoken by the Britons who live in Brittany, France.
The “English” are descended for mixture of people. Therefore all true Englishmen are in fact foreigners.
Also, if you took the time to examine the geneology of the current dynasty of the British Royal Family, a.k.a. the Windsors you would find that Her Majasty Queen Elizabeth II is a blood ancestor of His Majesty King Henry VIII of England, Her Majesty Queen Mary (Mary Queen of Scots) and His Majesty King James I, King of England and Scotland. In short, when England’s parliament brought in “those foreigners” all those years ago, they were not handing Great Britian over to foreign domination, they were mearly overlooking the “Catholic” claimants to the throne in favor of a “Protestant” one.
Please provide a source for your assertion that the City of London does not form part of England. it is served by the City of London Police force which is separate from the Metropolitan police force but that is a relatively minor detail.
I keep seeing this meme but here as elsewhere no plausible sources are quoted to support it.
Jennifer : you have been programmed to accept the idea that the English nation/culture/identity should be deconstructed without popular majority consent, nay genocided. Invasions have occurred in ancient times but I thought we were now supposed to be living in a democracy where majority will not brute force prevails, a majority being unsupportive of mass immigration.
Also, I thought there were DNA studies showing that whilst different genetic infusions have occurred over time, the preponderant origin of the vast bulk of the UK population’s genetic inheritance is from paeleolithic age settlers. The Welsh for instance may include some Celtic background but the bulk is far older.
This subject is now just a geopolitical issue trampling over the facts.
It’s pretty well established – even wikipedia discusses it:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/City_of_London_Corporation
I admit I do need to update the must reads section with source lists though.
Wikipedia is not the “source,” no other prove that the City of London is NOT the part of UK presented here.
Ok ok…the old “Wikipedia can be changed by anybody, it’s not accurate”.
Go change it and see what happens. It’s perhaps the most establishment site in the world.
We’ll go to the City of London’s own website:
http://www.cityoflondon.gov.uk/Corporation/LGNL_Services/Council_and_democracy/Council_departments/whatis.htm
…it operates on a non-party political basis through its Lord Mayor, Aldermen and members of the Court of Common Council.
Google it and it’s website description reads:
“From the municipal government for the City of London, the City of London Corporation.”
It’s essentially one giant corporation acting as a City, but acts nothing like a regular city – it has it’s own police force and various archaic rituals and systems.
Of course, it is within England, but it is not of it.
Jennifer, as Mr Stenham says, don’t believe the hype.
“We are an ancient people, and though the Isles have been the target of invasion and opposed settlement from abroad ever since Julius Caesar first stepped on to the shingle shores of Kent, these have barely scratched the topsoil of our deep-rooted ancestry. However we may feel about ourselves and about each other, we are genetically rooted in a Celtic past. The Irish, the Welsh and the Scots know this, but the English sometimes think otherwise. But, just a little way beneath the surface, the strands of ancestry weave us all together as the children of a common past.”
‘Blood of the Isles’, Bryan Sykes, (Professor of Human Genetics at The University of Oxford) Bantam Press,
London, 2006.
Great article by the way. I do suspect the Vatican plays something of a role in it all though.
A very good precis of the Ring of Power video.
However, I must correct you. The Mayor is not the head of the Corporation of London. The *Lord Mayor* is. They are not the same.
http://www.cityoflondon.gov.uk/Corporation/LGNL_Services/Council_and_democracy/Councillors_democracy_and_elections/The_Lord_Mayor/
I did make that clear. Take a look again.
Jennifer you stated that the Normans were French,
(In 1066 William the Conquerer invaded England. He was Norman – French)
The Normans were not French they were Norse (Scandinavian), Normandy did not become part of France
until around 1204 when the French defeated the Normans and assimilated Normandy into France.
The New Map Makers- check out the Pilgrims Society
the only reason that the city is a seperate entity to London is because of tax reasons it makes a much more profitable financial sector being a seperate entity that is the only reason no conspiracy theorys and London never gets attacked during a war oh does it not so hundreds of tons of bombs did’nt fall on London during WW2 the article is so wrong on so many points i’d be here all day pointing them out
So “tax reasons” isn’t a conspiracy to save tax?
Most of the german targets during WWII were ports, railway stations, industry, churches/cathedrals…you’d be hard pressed to find an important financial building.
“Ok ok…the old “Wikipedia can be changed by anybody, it’s not accurate”.
Go change it and see what happens. It’s perhaps the most establishment site in the world.”
Dearie me, Keelan, that’s pretty defensive (and, I have to say, rather feeble of you). Wikipedia can be a useful starting point fro research but its quality control is flawed and it is only intended to be a VERY BASIC introduction to topics anyway, it is certainly not an authoritative source.
I can certainly agree that the City of London is largely autonomous and unaccountable but you are mixing up truths, half-truths and outright wild conjecture in the same pot here.
Yes, the City has its own police force. It also houses the Central Criminal Court (aka the Old Bailey), which hears major criminal cases from the City and EVERY OTHER PART OF ENGLAND. It would be very strange for it to have jurisdiction in other parts of England if it wasn’t part of England, as you assert.
The idea that royalty are somehow subservient to the City is suspect too, considering that the Tower of London was a royal residence and still houses Lizzie’s jewellery.
The question of whether the PM or the Queen declares war is a semantic one these days. As head of state and head of the armed forces, then obviously the Queen has the final say on whether the country goes to war – but there are no documented examples of her overruling the PM on that, just as there haven’t been any refusals to Royal Assent in living memory. Even the Queen’s Speech at each State Opening of Parliament is written by government spin doctors.
The City of London was EXTENSIVELY bombed in the Second World War. One of the iconic images of the Blitz is of St Paul’s Cathedral standing relatively unscathed while surrounded by rubble – see http://www.aim25.ac.uk/partner_images/fullsize/118/L19078AR.jpg Perhaps you should talk to some of your older relatives about the war, as it’s very obvious that you weren’t “there”.
I think the article is a valiant effort to investigate what is really going on within that Square Mile, and I applaud you for that. But you let yourself down by relying so heavily on “facts” that aren’t really facts – you need to rely more on your own research of original sources and less on what you’ve read on other “conspiracy” sites and in YouTube clips.
Not defensive at all, yes it can be edited to say “big boobs” every once in a while, but it is quickly reverted to it’s establishment sources. But the point is mute, since you agree the City is a private enterprise anyway. “The City of London Corporation (also known as the Corporation of London)”…that’s all the source is for.
I consider there to be enough anomalies to say that it is not part of England. Perhaps you’d be happier if I put that it is not part of the regular English system, or something a long those lines. It’s clearly a phenomenon of its own.
Also perhaps you’d like to look in to the Ian Puddick case which is featured on here in regards to how City police operate at the behest of the financial giants.
And last time I checked St Paul’s Cathedral is not a bank. However I’ll concede that this point is speculation…I wrote this article in 2009 and it’s long overdue a re-write, I don’t like nor really endorse a lot of the early content on here. A better angle to take would have been to mention the wallstreet and financial supporters of Hitler.
Your last point is extremely patronizing. I’ll leave it at that.
My post was in fact constructive criticism and you only reinforce my perception of you being defensive by reacting in such a touchy manner.
St Paul’s Cathedral is a major feature of the City of London and I mentioned the very well-known image of it standing relatively unscathed while all around was rubble. The point is that the City most certainly WAS being targeted by German bombers during the Blitz. Here’s another shot of a bomb that ripped a massive hole between the Bank of England and the Stock Exchange: http://www.thesquaremilewalk.com/walks/blitz/images/bank_station.jpg.
Re “I consider there to be enough anomalies to say that it is not part of England.”
It’s certainly a peculiar place, although I haven’t seen anything yet that *really* justifies the statement that the City is “not part of England”. There are certainly some differences from the average English borough – the fact that it is almost entirely non-residential, for one thing. It does have some of the ceremonial trappings of an archaic city-state but it is part of the same legal system (both criminal and civil), does not have its own armed forces (saying it has its own police force doesn’t make it a separate city-state any more than the British Transport Police makes the rail network not part of England), uses the same currency and in just about every general aspect that I can think of is fully integrated into both the surrounding metropolis and country..
You say it’s a “mute [sic] point” about the Corporation of London being a private corporation. I think you’ll find that many town councils up and down the country used to call themselves municipal corporations, so I’m not really sure how this in itself proves that the Corporation of London is unlike other English councils… ;)
This is the kind of thing I was getting at when I mentioned you mixing up truths, half-truths and conjecture – the fact that the City of London’s council calls itself the “Corporation of London” is a bit of a “so what?” really.
Re financial backing of Hitler, this might well be a fruitful area of research. I appreciate it’s an old article and that you’re planning a rewrite. I only found it because I happened to be looking for info on the City of London myself, so hopefully you’ll at least be pleased about its search engine ranking. ;)
If you had ever taken the great tour they give at the Tower of London, you would know that the reason why the Tower was originally built was because William I could conquer all of England, but could not stop the merchants of the City of London from getting resupplied from the river Thames. Hence, he built a fortress right next to the little enclave and they have all been making money ever since. I would recommend starting down at the City in the morning to see the hustle and bustle and then heading to the Tower after lunch for the afternoon.
The Crown, has nothing to do with the city. It is a corporation sole that rules over the United Kingdom. The City of London Corporation is not the same as The Crown Corporation.
Another issue that is frequently used to slander the British royals is that they are alleged Nazis or of Nazi descent which is completely ignorant of the fact that Elizabeth II reigns because her relative before her in line was a personal friend of Hitler, and was photographed giving Hitler the full Nazi seig heil salute. He didn’t have to abdicate because he wanted to marry a commoner, he was already King and could have married anyone he wanted. He had to abdicate because England was not sympathetic to his friendliness with the German government. If Elizabeth II is such a Nazi, then why did Hitler call her mother the most dangerous woman in Europe? Clearly, the Windsors are definitely not pro-Nazi and rule England because they were against the Nazis.
The Queen may be related to Henry VIII and his daughter Queen Mary but Henry was a dirty vicious old man and as for Mary – least said better – but she was not called Bloody Mary for nothing. She was like her father a murderer. As the bloodline is officially carried through the males I think you will find that the “British” royals are essentially Germany. Not that it matters. A nation gets the “leaders it deserves” so as nation the UK does not have much to be proud considering the character of our leaders. Oh and also its (1) “Great Britain” (2) “merely” (3) ” Majesty”
Jennifer. The Queen may be related to Henry VIII and his daughter Queen Mary but Henry was a dirty vicious old man and as for Mary – least said better – but she was not called Bloody Mary for nothing. She was like her father a murderer. As the bloodline is officially carried through the males I think you will find that the “British” royals are essentially Germans. Not that it matters. A nation gets the “leaders it deserves” so as a nation the UK does not have much to be proud of considering the character of our leaders. Oh and also its (1) “Great Britain” (2) “merely” (3) ” Majesty”
Just to remind Jennifer, that the “Windsors” changed their name on 17 July 1917, when George V changed the name of his family from the German Saxe-Coburg and Gotha.
Incidenrtally, “Greek” Prince Philip is in fact a member of the House of Schleswig-Holstein-Sonderburg-Glücksburg, a branch of the House of Oldenburg. He actually adopted the name Mountbatten. Which is funny in itself, because that’s just an Anglacised version of the German Battenberg (as in cake).
So how NOT GERMAN are they really?
mandalisj, I suggest you look into “Greek” Prince Philips past. He’s not Mountbatten, he’s in fact a member of the House of Schleswig-Holstein-Sonderburg-Glücksburg. A VERY Nazi bunch of thugs. He’s even photographed in his youth attending funerals of Nazi’s, standing next to SS officers.
Not exactly the actions of an Anti-Nazi…. is it.
Apparently according to information from Edward VIIths daughter, Hitler was the son of George V, and Angela Merkel is the artificially inseminated daughter of Hitler.Don’t you think they all look rather alike.Camilla’s great grandmother I think was also a mistress of Edward VII.How many were there?Can anyone tell me if the City of London was hit by any bombs at all or Buckingham Palace or the Houses of Parliament or were the German bombers just unlucky.My mother and father in law deserve all the credit as spotters and anti aircraft gunners at Plymouth striking with limited succes their mission was to force the planes off course away from the City of Londonby an ack ack barrage rather then hitting the aircraft.There was no specsavers then for these 2 heros guzzling pints of Courage directors and a nip of mothers ruin.Some interesting documents discovered in the University clearly stated elite education system was investing in the reconstruction of Germany and Japan either before the war or during.
Thanks for the article, city of london, vatican city and columbia city are all separate states amongst our cities all linked to the Vatican.
I think it is interesting that Gibraltar was handed over by Spain in 1713, by signing the Treaty of Utrech, not to the UK but to the “crown of Great Britain” i.e. the City of London. Therefore when Spain asks for Gibraltar back, they are asking the wrong people, the British Government cannot hand Gibraltar back, because it isn’t theirs to give. The self determination thing is a smokescreen to cover up this basic fact.
.Without doubts its a very good article.Thanks.