Watch 7/7 The Big Picture online for free, for an in-depth independent investigation in to the July 7th attacks and the wider war on terror:
http://wideshut.co.uk/77-the-big-picture-documentary-reinvestigating-the-july-7th-london-bombings/

.
.

It has taken nearly five years for the government of this country to address the concerns of the 7/7 London Bombings survivors, but the inquests offered by Judge Heather Hallett will focus on answering questions many have already worked out through independent research and common sense; while ignoring the long list of anomalies that shed doubt on the official story itself and the historical context that surrounds the entire war on terror. There will be no public jury, which rules out the public inquiry wanted by many family members.

The main talking point as reported by the Associated Press is to “look at whether failures by British spies and police contributed to the attacks”.

The fact is, this notion has been abundantly clear for years now. It’s on public record that at least 3, if not all of the bombers had been monitored prior to the attacks, and that there had been numerous prior-warnings of attacks on the UK, including that from Saudi Arabia who claimed to have given specific details about an attack on the London underground.

While the government was vehemently denying our right to a public inquiry, releasing ambiguous and misleading “official narratives” and commissioning BBC hit pieces to make those questioning the official story seem like crazy conspiracy theorists and holocaust deniers; upstanding members of the public were conducting an inquiry by themselves, and coming to factual conclusions that YES “failures by British spies and police contributed to the attacks”, if not directly caused them.

Since the 1990s Britain has knowingly harbored Muslim extremists and directly funded their allies overseas, all while aligning itself with distorted, aggressive and antagonistic US foreign policy.

Omar Bakri, the leader of banned group Al Muhajiroun (later Islam4UK), was one such extremist, harbored by Britain.

The British authorities were well aware that Bakri was grooming Muslims in Britain to adopt the Jihad mentality.

Investigative reporter Jon Ronson who wrote a book entitled “Them: Adventures With Extremists” and filmed a documentary on Bakri, revealed in 1997 that there were training camps led by Bakri out of a gym/scout hut near Crawley, West Sussex. There were punchbags, treadmills, and a TV set showing videos promoting militant action. In the documentary around 30 men are being lectured as Bakri preaches, “…there is a time when a military struggle must take place in [Britain]. Jihad. It’s called conquering. One day, without question, [Britain] is going to be governed by Islam.… You must be ready to defend yourselves militarily.”

It also appears that the authorities were well aware of Bakri’s role in sending Muslims overseas for “Terror Training” in order to fight the Islamic cause in Bosnia and Kosovo.

As stated by Bakri in an interview by the Jamestown Foundation:
“I used to encourage people to go to Bosnia to help their Muslim brothers and sisters, when the law in the UK permitted that type of intervention.” (Pre-terrorism acts). “We used to help mostly in Bosnia and Kosovo as part of a broader humanitarian effort.”

Michael Meacher, member of Parliament for Oldham West and Royton (BNP country), who was sacked by the Labour party in 2003 for opposing the illegal war in Iraq, revealed in the Asian Guardian that “Britain’s security services helped to create Islamic warriors who eventually bit back against the west.” According to Meacher, the Delhi-based Observer Research Foundation published a report estimating “that about 200 Pakistani Muslims living in the UK went to Pakistan, trained in HUA camps and joined the HUA’s contingent in Bosnia. Most significantly, this was ‘with the full knowledge and complicity of the British and American intelligence agencies’.”

Harkat-ul- Ansar (HUA) is an offshoot of the original Mujahideen that was trained by the United States and their CIA asset Osama Bin laden, in order to fight the Soviets in Afghanistan. According to Meacher “the US wanted to raise another jihadi corps, again using proxies, to help Bosnian Muslims fight to weaken the Serb government’s hold on Yugoslavia.”

This is corroborated by former US federal prosecutor and terrorism expert John Loftus on the July 29, 2005, Fox News Dayside show. He said that, “back in the late 1990s, the [Muslim] leaders all worked for British intelligence in Kosovo. Believe it or not, British intelligence actually hired some Al-Qaeda guys to help defend the Muslim rights in Albania and in Kosovo. That’s when Al-Muhajiroun got started.”

So British based Muslims were recruited through Bakri’s Al-Muhajiroun camps and sent overseas under the watchful eye of British intelligence.

Al Muhajiroun Loftus says, “means The Emigrants. It was the recruiting arm…they specialized in recruiting kids whose families had emigrated to Britain but who had British passports. And they would use them for terrorist work.”

Similarly Al Qaeda means “the base” and was simply the term casually used for the training camp where Bin Laden and the Mujahideen were trained for their mission against Russia. It was also the name of the Islamic Conference intranet used to send coded messages. This was adopted by the CIA and the media as a boogyeman term used to imply all aspects of terrorism come from one single heirarchy led by Bin Laden.

During the conflicts in Bosnia and Kosovo Britain and the US fully supported militant Islam. Not just through Omar Bakri’s UK recruitment centre, but through the Kosovo Liberation Army (KLA). As reported by the Guardian in an article entitled ‘CIA’s bastard army ran riot in Balkans’ backed extremists’, Peter Beaumont, Ed Vulliamy and Paul Beaver spell out the operation:
The CIA encouraged former Kosovo Liberation Army fighters to launch a rebellion in southern Serbia in an effort to undermine the then Yugoslav President Slobodan Milosevic, according to senior European officers who served with the international peace-keeping force in Kosovo (K-For), as well as leading Macedonian and US sources.

One European K-For battalion commander told The Observer yesterday: ‘The CIA has been allowed to run riot in Kosovo with a private army designed to overthrow Slobodan Milosevic. Now he’s gone the US State Department seems incapable of reining in its bastard army.’

The same way they failed to rein in Al-Qaeda?

Dr. Robert M. Bowman, Lt Col, USAF elaborates on how all sides were played by the globalists:
The fact is, we started the war against Yugoslavia with the 1990 law cutting off funding unless the individual republics seceded from Yugoslavia and adopted capitalism. We used the CIA to stir up old hatreds, and supported reactionary forces in Croatia and Bosnia. We sabotaged peace deals which would have restored ethnic peace, and we used military force to support our chosen factions against their own people. We used military force to aid the Croatian fascists in the ethnic cleansing of hundreds of thousands of Serbs from Krajina, dumping them as refugees upon less-affluent Serbia. We simultaneously built up a KLA force of Contras to keep the pot boiling in Kosovo. We forced Yugoslavia to reject the Rambouillet “accords” and unleashed a massive bombing campaign which we justified by a refugee exodus which didn’t start until after we started bombing.

Michel Chossudovsky, Professor of Economics, University of Ottawa, also reports a similar situation:
The US [Defense Intelligence Agency] approached MI6 to arrange a training programme for the KLA, said a senior British military source. `MI6 then sub-contracted the operation to two British security companies, who in turn approached a number of former members of the (22 SAS) regiment. Lists were then drawn up of weapons and equipment needed by the KLA.’ While these covert operations were continuing, serving members of 22 SAS Regiment, mostly from the unit’s D Squadron, were first deployed in Kosovo before the beginning of the bombing campaign.

Although it is known by far less people, a lot of the KLA funding was allegedly derived from the drugs trade. Iran-Contra round two.

It is this type of historical context surrounding the rise of Muslim extremism that will be omitted from the 7/7 inquest. Fundamentalist Islam was a minority ideology prior to the CIA’s funding of the Mujahideen and later the Taliban. Extremist mentality in Britain would have had far less strength if it wasn’t for MI6 allowing hate filled preachers like Omar Bakri to recruit young men for Jihad and military action overseas in the 90s. This is without mentioning the pillaging of Muslim lands during the farcical wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, that no doubt angered many Muslims.

Nope, the premise of the inquest rides upon the fact that 4 young men woke up one day and decided to be bombers, and they wonder whether the intelligence agencies made a boo boo. You’re damn right they did; they’ve been doing so for 30 years!

The AP even reports that “Security officials have acknowledged that agents had the bombings’ ringleader, Mohammed Sidique Khan, under surveillance for more than a year before the attacks. The domestic intelligence agency, MI5, eventually halted the surveillance, deciding he was not a priority target.”

There’s a failure right there. We already know this. It’s been established publicly that foiled fertilizer attacks in 2004 on nightclubs were directly linked to two of the 7/7 bombers. Operation Crevice traced a series of planned attacks back to our good friend Omar Bakri and Al Muhajiroun; Mohammad Sidique Khan and Tanweer were two peripheral members of the cell, and two of several who were not apprehended so police could allegedly track them to a wider network and hopefully arrest even more terrorists, or because they simply didn’t think they were a threat and had a lack of resources to continue surveillance.

Germaine Lindsay “turned up in US government antiterror databases.”[2]. And was monitored by the FBI.[3]

Another established fact is that Khan and fellow bomber Shehzad Tanweer were bugged by MI5 for two months as they spoke about ways to fund extremism, fighting for Al Qaeda and going back to Pakistan to train. As reported by the Telegraph:
MI5 placed a “rumours and reality” rebuttal on its website last night, defending its actions. It said: “[Mohammed Sidique] Khan and [Shehzad] Tanweer were never identified during the fertiliser plot investigation because they were not involved in the planned attacks. Rather, they appeared as petty fraudsters in loose contact with members of the plot. There was no indication that they were involved in the planning of any kind of terrorist attack in the UK.”

But the leaked transcript of the conversation Mohammed Sidique Khan, the July 7 bomber, had with Omar Kyam, the leader of the fertiliser bomb cell, showed they spent most of the time talking about going to Pakistan and “operations”. Only two pages of a 10-page transcript refer to fraud. In the rest, Kyam tells Khan to be careful to obey his emir at the training camp and Khan wonders whether to say goodbye to his child.

Then there’s the decelerations by Omar Bakri that an attack on Britain was inevitable. And the numerous warnings from Israeli, French and Saudi intelligence that there would be bomb attacks on London.

Although this inquest might pacify the glaringly obvious intelligence failings that have been exposed time and time again in mainstream news, it certainly won’t delve too far in to history and almost certainly won’t bring up the anomalies in the actual bombings themselves; which are covered extensively in the new documentary 77 The Big Picture.

This is not a public inquiry, their minds have already been made up about what happened and who did it; it will simply allow a small amount of blame to placed on the intelligence agencies, the same agencies that nurtured a culture of extremism and had direct ties to several “assets” who were also in contact with the bombers prior to the attacks (see 77 The Big picture ^)